Thread
Commits
-
Fix heap_page_prune() parameter order confusion introduced in dc7420c2c92.
- 8001cb77ee6c 14.0 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Don't compute global horizons while building snapshots.
- dc7420c2c927 14.0 cited
-
Snapshot scalability patch issue
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> — 2021-02-15T02:42:18Z
The call to heap_page_prune() within lazy_scan_heap() passes a bool literal ('false') as its fourth argument. But the fourth argument is of type TransactionId, not bool. This has been the case since the snapshot scalability work performed by commit dc7420c2c92. Surely something is amiss here. I also notice some inconsistencies in the heap_page_prune() prototype names vs the corresponding definition names. Might be worth doing something about in passing. -- Peter Geoghegan -
Re: Snapshot scalability patch issue
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2021-02-15T23:08:40Z
Hi, On 2021-02-14 18:42:18 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > The call to heap_page_prune() within lazy_scan_heap() passes a bool > literal ('false') as its fourth argument. But the fourth argument is > of type TransactionId, not bool. This has been the case since the > snapshot scalability work performed by commit dc7420c2c92. Surely > something is amiss here. Looks like I accidentally swapped the InvalidTransactionId and false around - luckily they have the same actual bit pattern... I do wish C could pass arguments by name. I'll push something once I'm back at my computer... Greetings, Andres Freund -
Re: Snapshot scalability patch issue
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2021-02-16T01:30:12Z
Hi, On 2021-02-15 15:08:40 -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2021-02-14 18:42:18 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > The call to heap_page_prune() within lazy_scan_heap() passes a bool > > literal ('false') as its fourth argument. But the fourth argument is > > of type TransactionId, not bool. This has been the case since the > > snapshot scalability work performed by commit dc7420c2c92. Surely > > something is amiss here. > > Looks like I accidentally swapped the InvalidTransactionId and false > around - luckily they have the same actual bit pattern... > > I do wish C could pass arguments by name. > > I'll push something once I'm back at my computer... Done. Thanks for noticing/reporting! Greetings, Andres Freund -
Re: Snapshot scalability patch issue
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> — 2021-02-16T01:30:45Z
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 5:30 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > Done. Thanks for noticing/reporting! Great, thanks! -- Peter Geoghegan