Re: Snapshot scalability patch issue
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-02-16T01:30:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,
On 2021-02-15 15:08:40 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2021-02-14 18:42:18 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > The call to heap_page_prune() within lazy_scan_heap() passes a bool
> > literal ('false') as its fourth argument. But the fourth argument is
> > of type TransactionId, not bool. This has been the case since the
> > snapshot scalability work performed by commit dc7420c2c92. Surely
> > something is amiss here.
>
> Looks like I accidentally swapped the InvalidTransactionId and false
> around - luckily they have the same actual bit pattern...
>
> I do wish C could pass arguments by name.
>
> I'll push something once I'm back at my computer...
Done. Thanks for noticing/reporting!
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Commits
-
Fix heap_page_prune() parameter order confusion introduced in dc7420c2c92.
- 8001cb77ee6c 14.0 landed
-
snapshot scalability: Don't compute global horizons while building snapshots.
- dc7420c2c927 14.0 cited