Thread
Commits
-
Remove extra increment of plpgsql's statement counter for FOR loops.
- 78fab843386b 12.6 landed
- 0fe8b1f7d48e 13.2 landed
- dfcc46fe3030 14.0 landed
-
bugfix - plpgsql - statement counter is incremented 2x for FOR stmt
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> — 2021-02-02T17:20:46Z
Hi When I fixed one plpgsql_check issue, I found another plpgsql issue. Now we have field nstatements that hold a number of plpgsql statements in function. Unfortunately I made an error when I wrote this functionality and for FOR statements, this counter is incremented 2x. Higher number than a real number is better than a lesser number, but it can be a source of problems too (inside plpgsql_check I iterate over 0 .. nstatements stmtid, and due this bug I had a problem with missing statements). Attached patch is pretty simple: Regards Pavel
-
Re: bugfix - plpgsql - statement counter is incremented 2x for FOR stmt
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2021-02-02T19:36:19Z
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > When I fixed one plpgsql_check issue, I found another plpgsql issue. Now we > have field nstatements that hold a number of plpgsql statements in > function. Unfortunately I made an error when I wrote this functionality and > for FOR statements, this counter is incremented 2x. Higher number than a > real number is better than a lesser number, but it can be a source of > problems too (inside plpgsql_check I iterate over 0 .. nstatements stmtid, > and due this bug I had a problem with missing statements). > Attached patch is pretty simple: Right, done. regards, tom lane
-
Re: bugfix - plpgsql - statement counter is incremented 2x for FOR stmt
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> — 2021-02-02T19:54:47Z
út 2. 2. 2021 v 20:36 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > > When I fixed one plpgsql_check issue, I found another plpgsql issue. Now > we > > have field nstatements that hold a number of plpgsql statements in > > function. Unfortunately I made an error when I wrote this functionality > and > > for FOR statements, this counter is incremented 2x. Higher number than a > > real number is better than a lesser number, but it can be a source of > > problems too (inside plpgsql_check I iterate over 0 .. nstatements > stmtid, > > and due this bug I had a problem with missing statements). > > > Attached patch is pretty simple: > > Right, done. > Thank you for commit Regards Pavel > regards, tom lane >