Thread
Commits
-
docs: Note the recovery_min_apply_delay bloats pg_wal.
- ad385a494f6a 15.0 landed
-
Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
- 36da3cfb457b 9.4.0 cited
-
pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> — 2013-12-12T10:56:36Z
Allow time delayed standbys and recovery Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for commit and restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed immediately. Delay is measured between WAL record time and local standby time. Robert Haas, Fabrízio de Royes Mello and Simon Riggs Detailed review by Mitsumasa Kondo Branch ------ master Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/36da3cfb457b77a55582f68208d815f11ac1399e Modified Files -------------- doc/src/sgml/recovery-config.sgml | 50 ++++++++++ src/backend/access/transam/recovery.conf.sample | 9 ++ src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-
Re: pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> — 2013-12-19T10:03:06Z
--On 12. Dezember 2013 10:56:36 +0000 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: > Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for > commit and restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed > immediately. Delay is measured between WAL record time and local standby > time. There's a small typo in the first paragraph, "paramater" should be "parameter": diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/recovery-config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/recovery-config.sgml new file mode 100644 index ee5dc86..550cdce *** a/doc/src/sgml/recovery-config.sgml --- b/doc/src/sgml/recovery-config.sgml *************** restore_command = 'copy "C:\\server\\arc *** 152,158 **** By default, a standby server keeps restoring WAL records from the primary as soon as possible. It may be useful to have a time-delayed copy of the data, offering various options to correct data loss errors. ! This paramater allows you to delay recovery by a fixed period of time, specified in milliseconds if no unit is specified. For example, if you set this parameter to <literal>5min</literal>, the standby will replay each transaction commit only when the system time on the standby --- 152,158 ---- By default, a standby server keeps restoring WAL records from the primary as soon as possible. It may be useful to have a time-delayed copy of the data, offering various options to correct data loss errors. ! This parameter allows you to delay recovery by a fixed period of time, specified in milliseconds if no unit is specified. For example, if you set this parameter to <literal>5min</literal>, the standby will replay each transaction commit only when the system time on the standby -- Thanks Bernd -
Re: pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> — 2013-12-19T10:26:47Z
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> wrote: > > > --On 12. Dezember 2013 10:56:36 +0000 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> > wrote: > >> Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for >> commit and restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed >> immediately. Delay is measured between WAL record time and local standby >> time. > > > There's a small typo in the first paragraph, "paramater" should be > "parameter": Thanks for the report! Committed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
-
Re: pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> — 2013-12-19T19:19:21Z
On 12 December 2013 10:56, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Allow time delayed standbys and recovery > > Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for commit and > restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed immediately. Delay is > measured between WAL record time and local standby time. > > Robert Haas, Fabrízio de Royes Mello and Simon Riggs > Detailed review by Mitsumasa Kondo Could a note be added about the additional disk space requirements for WAL on the standby? If one is delaying replay, WAL files created over the delayed period will build up in pg_xlog on the standby until they're consumed upon replay, so considerations about storing those additional files will need to be made. It may otherwise trip up anyone who, say, delays replay by 24 hours in a busy production environment, and finds they have run out of disk space and no longer have a valid standby. -- Thom
-
Re: pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> — 2013-12-19T19:33:28Z
On 19 December 2013 19:19, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 12 December 2013 10:56, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Allow time delayed standbys and recovery >> >> Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for commit and >> restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed immediately. Delay is >> measured between WAL record time and local standby time. >> >> Robert Haas, Fabrízio de Royes Mello and Simon Riggs >> Detailed review by Mitsumasa Kondo > > Could a note be added about the additional disk space requirements for > WAL on the standby? If one is delaying replay, WAL files created over > the delayed period will build up in pg_xlog on the standby until > they're consumed upon replay, so considerations about storing those > additional files will need to be made. It may otherwise trip up > anyone who, say, delays replay by 24 hours in a busy production > environment, and finds they have run out of disk space and no longer > have a valid standby. Thanks Thom, good point. I will add a note to the docs. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-
Re: pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> — 2014-02-26T13:07:51Z
On 19 December 2013 19:33, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 19 December 2013 19:19, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > On 12 December 2013 10:56, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Allow time delayed standbys and recovery > >> > >> Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for > commit and > >> restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed immediately. > Delay is > >> measured between WAL record time and local standby time. > >> > >> Robert Haas, Fabrízio de Royes Mello and Simon Riggs > >> Detailed review by Mitsumasa Kondo > > > > Could a note be added about the additional disk space requirements for > > WAL on the standby? If one is delaying replay, WAL files created over > > the delayed period will build up in pg_xlog on the standby until > > they're consumed upon replay, so considerations about storing those > > additional files will need to be made. It may otherwise trip up > > anyone who, say, delays replay by 24 hours in a busy production > > environment, and finds they have run out of disk space and no longer > > have a valid standby. > > Thanks Thom, good point. I will add a note to the docs. > Just a reminder that this note hasn't been added to the docs yet. -- Thom
-
Re: pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> — 2014-02-26T13:32:25Z
On 26 February 2014 13:07, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 19 December 2013 19:33, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> On 19 December 2013 19:19, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >> > On 12 December 2013 10:56, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> Allow time delayed standbys and recovery >> >> >> >> Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for >> >> commit and >> >> restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed immediately. >> >> Delay is >> >> measured between WAL record time and local standby time. >> >> >> >> Robert Haas, Fabrízio de Royes Mello and Simon Riggs >> >> Detailed review by Mitsumasa Kondo >> > >> > Could a note be added about the additional disk space requirements for >> > WAL on the standby? If one is delaying replay, WAL files created over >> > the delayed period will build up in pg_xlog on the standby until >> > they're consumed upon replay, so considerations about storing those >> > additional files will need to be made. It may otherwise trip up >> > anyone who, say, delays replay by 24 hours in a busy production >> > environment, and finds they have run out of disk space and no longer >> > have a valid standby. >> >> Thanks Thom, good point. I will add a note to the docs. > > > Just a reminder that this note hasn't been added to the docs yet. Please cut a doc patch and I'll apply. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-
Re: pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> — 2014-02-26T13:55:39Z
On 26 February 2014 13:32, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 26 February 2014 13:07, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > On 19 December 2013 19:33, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 19 December 2013 19:19, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > >> > On 12 December 2013 10:56, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> >> Allow time delayed standbys and recovery > >> >> > >> >> Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for > >> >> commit and > >> >> restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed immediately. > >> >> Delay is > >> >> measured between WAL record time and local standby time. > >> >> > >> >> Robert Haas, Fabrízio de Royes Mello and Simon Riggs > >> >> Detailed review by Mitsumasa Kondo > >> > > >> > Could a note be added about the additional disk space requirements for > >> > WAL on the standby? If one is delaying replay, WAL files created over > >> > the delayed period will build up in pg_xlog on the standby until > >> > they're consumed upon replay, so considerations about storing those > >> > additional files will need to be made. It may otherwise trip up > >> > anyone who, say, delays replay by 24 hours in a busy production > >> > environment, and finds they have run out of disk space and no longer > >> > have a valid standby. > >> > >> Thanks Thom, good point. I will add a note to the docs. > > > > > > Just a reminder that this note hasn't been added to the docs yet. > > Please cut a doc patch and I'll apply. Attached. -- Thom
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> — 2022-04-05T12:40:47Z
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 at 13:55, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > On 26 February 2014 13:32, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> On 26 February 2014 13:07, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >> > On 19 December 2013 19:33, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 19 December 2013 19:19, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >> >> > On 12 December 2013 10:56, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> >> Allow time delayed standbys and recovery >> >> >> >> >> >> Set min_recovery_apply_delay to force a delay in recovery apply for >> >> >> commit and >> >> >> restore point WAL records. Other records are replayed immediately. >> >> >> Delay is >> >> >> measured between WAL record time and local standby time. >> >> >> >> >> >> Robert Haas, Fabrízio de Royes Mello and Simon Riggs >> >> >> Detailed review by Mitsumasa Kondo >> >> > >> >> > Could a note be added about the additional disk space requirements for >> >> > WAL on the standby? If one is delaying replay, WAL files created over >> >> > the delayed period will build up in pg_xlog on the standby until >> >> > they're consumed upon replay, so considerations about storing those >> >> > additional files will need to be made. It may otherwise trip up >> >> > anyone who, say, delays replay by 24 hours in a busy production >> >> > environment, and finds they have run out of disk space and no longer >> >> > have a valid standby. >> >> >> >> Thanks Thom, good point. I will add a note to the docs. >> > >> > >> > Just a reminder that this note hasn't been added to the docs yet. >> >> Please cut a doc patch and I'll apply. > > > Attached. I know it's been 8 years, but I still think it would be a useful note to add to the docs. -- Thom
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2022-04-05T14:54:30Z
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:41 AM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > I know it's been 8 years, but I still think it would be a useful note > to add to the docs. Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects. I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure what would be better and I think the meaning is clear. Also one of us will need to do s/pg_xlog/pg_wal/. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> — 2022-04-05T14:58:43Z
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:54 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:41 AM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > I know it's been 8 years, but I still think it would be a useful note > > to add to the docs. > Many points for bringing that one back :) Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects. > > I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over > the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure > what would be better and I think the meaning is clear. > Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're referring to? -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2022-04-05T15:01:56Z
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:58 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects. >> >> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over >> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure >> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear. > > Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're referring to? Yeah, something like that, maybe. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> — 2022-04-06T00:42:48Z
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 16:02, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:58 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > >> Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects. > >> > >> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over > >> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure > >> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear. > > > > Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're referring to? > > Yeah, something like that, maybe. I share your discomfort with the wording. How about: WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied. Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL files, increasing disk space requirements for the standby's <filename>pg_wal</> directory. -- Thom
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> — 2022-04-06T01:04:48Z
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 at 01:42, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 16:02, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:58 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > >> Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects. > > >> > > >> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over > > >> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure > > >> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear. > > > > > > Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're referring to? > > > > Yeah, something like that, maybe. > > I share your discomfort with the wording. How about: > > WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied. > Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL files, > increasing disk space requirements for the standby's <filename>pg_wal</> > directory. *must be kept on the standby -- Thom
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2022-04-06T12:15:19Z
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:43 PM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > I share your discomfort with the wording. How about: > > WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied. > Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL files, > increasing disk space requirements for the standby's <filename>pg_wal</> > directory. Looks awesome. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2022-04-08T13:36:27Z
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:15 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:43 PM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > I share your discomfort with the wording. How about: > > > > WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied. > > Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL files, > > increasing disk space requirements for the standby's <filename>pg_wal</> > > directory. > > Looks awesome. Here that is in patch form. I feel that the feature freeze should not preclude committing this documentation improvement, but if someone feels otherwise, then I will leave this until the tree reopens. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> — 2022-04-08T13:45:18Z
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:36 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:15 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:43 PM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > > I share your discomfort with the wording. How about: > > > > > > WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied. > > > Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL > files, > > > increasing disk space requirements for the standby's > <filename>pg_wal</> > > > directory. > > > > Looks awesome. > > Here that is in patch form. I feel that the feature freeze should not > preclude committing this documentation improvement, but if someone > feels otherwise, then I will leave this until the tree reopens. > We normally allow documentation and bug fixes after the feature freeze. (It's only in the "we're about to wrap the release right now"-freeze that we have to avoid those) -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> — 2022-04-08T14:44:51Z
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, 14:36 Robert Haas, <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:15 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:43 PM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > > I share your discomfort with the wording. How about: > > > > > > WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied. > > > Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL > files, > > > increasing disk space requirements for the standby's > <filename>pg_wal</> > > > directory. > > > > Looks awesome. > > Here that is in patch form. I feel that the feature freeze should not > preclude committing this documentation improvement, but if someone > feels otherwise, then I will leave this until the tree reopens. > Thanks. This doesn't include my self-correction: s/kept on standby/kept on the standby/ Thom >
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2022-04-08T15:10:09Z
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 10:45 AM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > Thanks. This doesn't include my self-correction: > > s/kept on standby/kept on the standby/ Here is v2, endeavoring to rectify that oversight. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2022-04-11T14:55:00Z
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 11:10 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 10:45 AM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > Thanks. This doesn't include my self-correction: > > > > s/kept on standby/kept on the standby/ > > Here is v2, endeavoring to rectify that oversight. Committed. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> — 2022-04-11T18:51:03Z
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, 15:55 Robert Haas, <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 11:10 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 10:45 AM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > > Thanks. This doesn't include my self-correction: > > > > > > s/kept on standby/kept on the standby/ > > > > Here is v2, endeavoring to rectify that oversight. > > Committed. > Much appreciated. Thom >