Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-04-05T15:01:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:58 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects.
>>
>> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over
>> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure
>> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear.
>
> Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're referring to?

Yeah, something like that, maybe.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



Commits

  1. docs: Note the recovery_min_apply_delay bloats pg_wal.

  2. Allow time delayed standbys and recovery