Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-04-05T14:58:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:54 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:41 AM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> > I know it's been 8 years, but I still think it would be a useful note
> > to add to the docs.
>

Many points for bringing that one back :)


Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects.
>
> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over
> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure
> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear.
>

Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're
referring to?


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

Commits

  1. docs: Note the recovery_min_apply_delay bloats pg_wal.

  2. Allow time delayed standbys and recovery