Thread
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix sign-compare warnings in pg_iovec.h.
- 0fa688406595 18.0 landed
- 0a883a067bd7 17.1 landed
-
Fix port/pg_iovec.h building extensions on x86_64-darwin
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> — 2024-11-08T19:08:06Z
When building pg_cron [1] or pg_hll [2] for PG 17 on x86_64-darwin, we encounter the following build failure in nixpkgs: /nix/store/2clw9wg933c40f871d8iqbl909lg2yis-postgresql-17.0-dev/include/server/port/pg_iovec.h:71:12: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'ssize_t' (aka 'long') and 'const size_t' (aka 'const unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wsign-compare] if (part < iov[i].iov_len) ~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /nix/store/2clw9wg933c40f871d8iqbl909lg2yis-postgresql-17.0-dev/include/server/port/pg_iovec.h:110:12: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'ssize_t' (aka 'long') and 'const size_t' (aka 'const unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wsign-compare] if (part < iov[i].iov_len) ~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 errors generated. The attached patch fixes those. Hopefully this can make it into the minor release next week. Best, Wolfgang [1]: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/276421287/nixlog/1 [2]: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/276419879/nixlog/1 -
Re: Fix port/pg_iovec.h building extensions on x86_64-darwin
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2024-11-08T20:00:36Z
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 08:08:06PM +0100, Wolfgang Walther wrote: > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ pg_preadv(int fd, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt, off_t offset) > } > sum += part; > offset += part; > - if (part < iov[i].iov_len) > + if ((size_t) part < iov[i].iov_len) > return sum; > } > return sum; > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ pg_pwritev(int fd, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt, off_t offset) > } > sum += part; > offset += part; > - if (part < iov[i].iov_len) > + if ((size_t) part < iov[i].iov_len) > return sum; > } > return sum; This looks correct to me. At this point in the code, we know that part >= 0, so casting it to an unsigned long ought to be okay. -- nathan
-
Re: Fix port/pg_iovec.h building extensions on x86_64-darwin
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2024-11-08T21:20:00Z
Here is a new version of the patch with an updated commit message. The cfbot results [0] look good, so I plan to commit this one shortly unless someone objects. [0] https://cirrus-ci.com/build/6599760059039744 -- nathan
-
Re: Fix port/pg_iovec.h building extensions on x86_64-darwin
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2024-11-08T22:15:47Z
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:20:00PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > Here is a new version of the patch with an updated commit message. The > cfbot results [0] look good, so I plan to commit this one shortly unless > someone objects. Committed. -- nathan
-
Re: Fix port/pg_iovec.h building extensions on x86_64-darwin
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> — 2024-11-08T22:26:44Z
On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 8:08 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> wrote: > When building pg_cron [1] or pg_hll [2] for PG 17 on x86_64-darwin, we > encounter the following build failure in nixpkgs: Out of curiosity, is nixos deliberately using an old macOS deployment target or SDK, 10.something? I'm just wondering if our feature detection is working correctly on macOS/x86, because I'd expect real preadv/pwritev to be there from 11 onwards, and 11 is already out of support by Apple.
-
Re: Fix port/pg_iovec.h building extensions on x86_64-darwin
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2024-11-08T22:36:18Z
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 11:26:44AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > Out of curiosity, is nixos deliberately using an old macOS deployment > target or SDK, 10.something? I'm just wondering if our feature > detection is working correctly on macOS/x86, because I'd expect real > preadv/pwritev to be there from 11 onwards, and 11 is already out of > support by Apple. It appears to be working for longfin [0]. [0] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=longfin&dt=2024-11-08%2021%3A36%3A02&stg=configure -- nathan
-
Re: Fix port/pg_iovec.h building extensions on x86_64-darwin
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> — 2024-11-09T11:06:07Z
Thomas Munro: > Out of curiosity, is nixos deliberately using an old macOS deployment > target or SDK, 10.something? I'm just wondering if our feature > detection is working correctly on macOS/x86, because I'd expect real > preadv/pwritev to be there from 11 onwards, and 11 is already out of > support by Apple. There has been a lot of work on the macOS SDK in nixpkgs lately, but it seems that the default for x86-64 is still v10 [1], yes: > x86_64-darwin uses the 10.12 SDK by default, but some software is not > compatible with that version of the SDK. In that case, the 11.0 SDK > used by aarch64-darwin is available for use on x86_64-darwin. [...] It seems like the goal is to bump x86-64 to v11 in the next release cycle [2]. Best, Wolfgang [1]: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#sec-darwin [2]: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/on-the-future-of-darwin-sdks-or-how-you-can-stop-worrying-and-put-the-sdk-in-build-inputs/50574/11