Thread

1. Bitnami deprecation

   Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp@protonmail.ch> — 2025-08-11T15:33:06Z

   Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page.
   
   See:
   
   https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164
   
   
   
   

2. Re: Bitnami deprecation

   Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> — 2025-08-11T15:49:32Z

   On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote:
   > Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page.
   > 
   > See:
   > 
   > https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164
   > 
   
   Yeah, going here:
   
   https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql
   
   gets a 404 page.
   
   
   -- 
   Adrian Klaver
   adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
   
   
   
   

3. Re: Bitnami deprecation

   Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> — 2025-08-12T10:34:36Z

   > On 11 Aug 2025, at 17:49, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
   > On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote:
   
   >> Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page.
   >> See:
   >> https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164
   
   Reading that doesn't make it obvious that we should remove Bitnami from the
   page, they are still offering (what they now call hardened images) postgresql:
   
   https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnamisecure/postgresql
   
   Looking at their catalog they are up to date with the most recent 16 minor
   release but no 17 version AFAICT.
   
   https://app-catalog.vmware.com/bitnami/apps/33ff5603-01b2-4310-a541-0d24b516cb56
   
   Keeping it on the other hand opens the question of why we aren't linking to
   other similar distributions and operators.
   
   > Yeah, going here:
   > https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql
   > gets a 404 page.
   
   Right, that clearly needs to be fixed.
   
   --
   Daniel Gustafsson
   
   
   
   
   

4. Re: Bitnami deprecation

   Rachel Roch <rroch@tutanota.de> — 2025-08-13T12:47:24Z

   I think you missed this rather critical bit on the Github, Daniel ....
   
   "Post-August 28th, 2025
   - For development purposes, community-tier users are restricted to pulling only the most recent ‘latest’ tags of the limited community-tier subset of container images.
   - Production users should subscribe to Bitnami Secure Images for full version support"
   
   12 Aug 2025, 11:35 by daniel@yesql.se:
   
   >> On 11 Aug 2025, at 17:49, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
   >> On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote:
   >>
   >>> Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page.
   >>> See:
   >>> https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164
   >>>
   >
   > Reading that doesn't make it obvious that we should remove Bitnami from the
   > page, they are still offering (what they now call hardened images) postgresql:
   >
   > https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnamisecure/postgresql
   >
   > Looking at their catalog they are up to date with the most recent 16 minor
   > release but no 17 version AFAICT.
   >
   > https://app-catalog.vmware.com/bitnami/apps/33ff5603-01b2-4310-a541-0d24b516cb56
   >
   > Keeping it on the other hand opens the question of why we aren't linking to
   > other similar distributions and operators.
   >
   >> Yeah, going here:
   >> https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql
   >> gets a 404 page.
   >>
   >
   > Right, that clearly needs to be fixed.
   >
   > --
   > Daniel Gustafsson
   >
   >
   >
   
   
   
   
   

5. Re: Bitnami deprecation

   Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> — 2026-05-26T16:07:29Z

   Re: Rachel Roch
   > "Post-August 28th, 2025
   > - For development purposes, community-tier users are restricted to pulling only the most recent ‘latest’ tags of the limited community-tier subset of container images.
   > - Production users should subscribe to Bitnami Secure Images for full version support"
   
   I stumbled over the bitnami link on the downloads page while working
   on something else at pgconf.dev.
   
   Can we just remove it now? It is still dead, and the value it adds
   over random other docker/whatever images is 0.
   
   Christoph
   
   
   
   

6. Re: Bitnami deprecation

   Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> — 2026-05-26T22:10:38Z

   > On 26 May 2026, at 18:07, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
   > 
   > Re: Rachel Roch
   >> "Post-August 28th, 2025
   >> - For development purposes, community-tier users are restricted to pulling only the most recent ‘latest’ tags of the limited community-tier subset of container images.
   >> - Production users should subscribe to Bitnami Secure Images for full version support"
   > 
   > I stumbled over the bitnami link on the downloads page while working
   > on something else at pgconf.dev.
   > 
   > Can we just remove it now? It is still dead, and the value it adds
   > over random other docker/whatever images is 0.
   
   I won't object to it.
   
   --
   Daniel Gustafsson
   
   
   
   
   

7. Re: Bitnami deprecation

   Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> — 2026-05-27T09:15:07Z

   Re: Daniel Gustafsson
   > > On 26 May 2026, at 18:07, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
   > > 
   > > Re: Rachel Roch
   > >> "Post-August 28th, 2025
   > >> - For development purposes, community-tier users are restricted to pulling only the most recent ‘latest’ tags of the limited community-tier subset of container images.
   > >> - Production users should subscribe to Bitnami Secure Images for full version support"
   > > 
   > > I stumbled over the bitnami link on the downloads page while working
   > > on something else at pgconf.dev.
   > > 
   > > Can we just remove it now? It is still dead, and the value it adds
   > > over random other docker/whatever images is 0.
   > 
   > I won't object to it.
   
   Done, thanks.
   
   Christoph