Re: Bitnami deprecation

Rachel Roch <rroch@tutanota.de>

From: Rachel Roch <rroch@tutanota.de>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>, Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp@protonmail.ch>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-08-13T12:47:24Z
Lists: pgsql-general
I think you missed this rather critical bit on the Github, Daniel ....

"Post-August 28th, 2025
- For development purposes, community-tier users are restricted to pulling only the most recent ‘latest’ tags of the limited community-tier subset of container images.
- Production users should subscribe to Bitnami Secure Images for full version support"

12 Aug 2025, 11:35 by daniel@yesql.se:

>> On 11 Aug 2025, at 17:49, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
>> On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page.
>>> See:
>>> https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164
>>>
>
> Reading that doesn't make it obvious that we should remove Bitnami from the
> page, they are still offering (what they now call hardened images) postgresql:
>
> https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnamisecure/postgresql
>
> Looking at their catalog they are up to date with the most recent 16 minor
> release but no 17 version AFAICT.
>
> https://app-catalog.vmware.com/bitnami/apps/33ff5603-01b2-4310-a541-0d24b516cb56
>
> Keeping it on the other hand opens the question of why we aren't linking to
> other similar distributions and operators.
>
>> Yeah, going here:
>> https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql
>> gets a 404 page.
>>
>
> Right, that clearly needs to be fixed.
>
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson
>
>
>