Thread
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make more use of RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP().
- bb109382ef40 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> — 2025-06-10T16:07:35Z
Hi hackers, While reviewing the Merge/Split partitions patch[0], I found some places in tablecmds.c where RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP can be used but not, such as: /* If the parent is temp, it must belong to this session */ if (rel->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP && !rel->rd_islocaltemp) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE), errmsg("cannot attach as partition of temporary relation of another session"))); /* Ditto for the partition */ if (attachrel->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP && !attachrel->rd_islocaltemp) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE), errmsg("cannot attach temporary relation of another session as partition"))); All other files perform this check using RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP. Should we update tablecmds.c to do the same for consistency? [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/884bcf9e-d6e3-4b0c-8dcb-7f2110070ac9@postgrespro.ru -- Regards Junwang Zhao -
Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2025-06-10T16:30:35Z
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:07:35AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote: > All other files perform this check using RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP. > Should we update tablecmds.c to do the same for consistency? Seems like a good idea. -- nathan
-
Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> — 2025-06-10T23:41:54Z
Hi Nathan, On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:30 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:07:35AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote: > > All other files perform this check using RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP. > > Should we update tablecmds.c to do the same for consistency? > > Seems like a good idea. Thanks for the comment. I have attached a patch with the proposed changes. > > -- > nathan -- Regards Junwang Zhao
-
Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> — 2025-06-11T11:10:49Z
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:12 AM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:30 AM Nathan Bossart > <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:07:35AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote: > > > All other files perform this check using RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP. > > > Should we update tablecmds.c to do the same for consistency? > > > > Seems like a good idea. > > Thanks for the comment. > > I have attached a patch with the proposed changes. > LGTM. I looked at other instances of is_localtemp, but none of them have (relation)->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP there. Your patch has covered all the existing ones. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
-
Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> — 2025-06-11T11:35:39Z
Hi Ashutosh, On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 7:11 PM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:12 AM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Nathan, >> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:30 AM Nathan Bossart >> <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:07:35AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote: >> > > All other files perform this check using RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP. >> > > Should we update tablecmds.c to do the same for consistency? >> > >> > Seems like a good idea. >> >> Thanks for the comment. >> >> I have attached a patch with the proposed changes. > > > LGTM. I looked at other instances of is_localtemp, but none of them have (relation)->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP there. Your patch has covered all the existing ones. Thank you for the review and the additional check. I have created a cf entry to track this. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5815/ > > -- > Best Wishes, > Ashutosh Bapat -- Regards Junwang Zhao
-
Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2025-06-12T19:53:38Z
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 07:35:39PM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote: > I have created a cf entry to track this. > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5815/ I'll plan on committing this once v19 development begins. -- nathan
-
Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> — 2025-06-13T01:54:59Z
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 3:53 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 07:35:39PM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote: > > I have created a cf entry to track this. > > > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5815/ > > I'll plan on committing this once v19 development begins. Sure, I just checked the CF entry, thanks for taking care of it. > > -- > nathan -- Regards Junwang Zhao
-
Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2025-07-02T17:34:23Z
Committed. -- nathan