Thread

Commits

  1. Rethink recent fix for pg_dump's handling of extension config tables.

  1. pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-06-26T13:57:04Z

    Found when working against release 12.
    
    
    Given the following extension:
    
    
    ::::::::::::::
    share/postgresql/extension/dummy--1.0.0.sql
    ::::::::::::::
    -- complain if script is sourced in psql, rather than via CREATE EXTENSION
    \echo Use "CREATE EXTENSION dummy" to load this file. \quit
    
    CREATE TABLE @extschema@.dummytab (
           a int,
           b int,
           c int);
    SELECT pg_catalog.pg_extension_config_dump('dummytab', '');
    
    
    ::::::::::::::
    share/postgresql/extension/dummy.control
    ::::::::::::::
    # dummy extension
    comment = 'dummy'
    default_version = '1.0.0'
    relocatable = false
    
    
    and this use of it:
    
    
    bin/psql -c 'create schema dummy; create extension  dummy schema dummy;
    insert into dummy.dummytab values(1,2,3);'
    
    
    this command segfaults:
    
    
    bin/pg_dump -a --column-inserts -n dummy
    
    
    It appears that for extension owned tables tbinfo.attgenerated isn't
    being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which is line
    2109 in git tip, is failing.
    
    
    I'm looking for a fix, but if anyone has a quick fix that would be nice :-)
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    -- 
    Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-06-26T14:24:33Z

    On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > It appears that for extension owned tables tbinfo.attgenerated isn't
    > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which is line
    > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    >
    >
    
    Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    -- 
    Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2020-06-26T14:55:26Z

    On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:24 AM Andrew Dunstan <
    andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > It appears that for extension owned tables tbinfo.attgenerated isn't
    > > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which is line
    > > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    > >
    > >
    >
    > Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    >
    
    Having a look on it.
    
    --
       Fabrízio de Royes Mello         Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
       PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
    
  4. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2020-06-26T18:10:17Z

    On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
    fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:24 AM Andrew Dunstan <
    andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > It appears that for extension owned tables tbinfo.attgenerated isn't
    > > > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which is line
    > > > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > > Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    > >
    >
    > Having a look on it.
    >
    
    Seems when qualify the schemaname the the "tbinfo->interesting" field is
    not setted for extensions objects, so the getTableAttrs can't fill the
    attgenerated field properly.
    
    I'm not 100% sure it's the correct way but the attached patch works for me
    and all tests passed. Maybe we should add more TAP tests?
    
    Regards,
    
    --
       Fabrízio de Royes Mello         Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
       PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
    
  5. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-06-26T21:48:23Z

    On 6/26/20 2:10 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    >
    > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello
    > <fabriziomello@gmail.com <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:24 AM Andrew Dunstan
    > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > > It appears that for extension owned tables tbinfo.attgenerated isn't
    > > > > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which
    > is line
    > > > > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    > > >
    > >
    > > Having a look on it.
    > >
    >
    > Seems when qualify the schemaname the the "tbinfo->interesting" field
    > is not setted for extensions objects, so the getTableAttrs can't fill
    > the attgenerated field properly.
    >
    > I'm not 100% sure it's the correct way but the attached patch works
    > for me and all tests passed. Maybe we should add more TAP tests?
    >
    >
    
    
    Thanks for this.
    
    It looks sane to me, I'll let others weigh in on it though. Yes we
    should have a TAP test for it.
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    -- 
    Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
    
  6. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-07-11T23:07:07Z

    On 6/26/20 2:10 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    >
    > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello
    > <fabriziomello@gmail.com <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:24 AM Andrew Dunstan
    > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > > It appears that for extension owned tables tbinfo.attgenerated isn't
    > > > > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which
    > is line
    > > > > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    > > >
    > >
    > > Having a look on it.
    > >
    >
    > Seems when qualify the schemaname the the "tbinfo->interesting" field
    > is not setted for extensions objects, so the getTableAttrs can't fill
    > the attgenerated field properly.
    >
    > I'm not 100% sure it's the correct way but the attached patch works
    > for me and all tests passed. Maybe we should add more TAP tests?
    >
    >
    
    
    I just tried this patch out on master, with the test case I gave
    upthread. It's not working, still getting a segfault.
    
    
    Will look closer.
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    -- 
    Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
    
  7. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2020-07-13T14:52:23Z

    On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 8:07 PM Andrew Dunstan <
    andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > On 6/26/20 2:10 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    > >
    > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello
    > > <fabriziomello@gmail.com <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:24 AM Andrew Dunstan
    > > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > > > It appears that for extension owned tables tbinfo.attgenerated
    isn't
    > > > > > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which
    > > is line
    > > > > > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > Having a look on it.
    > > >
    > >
    > > Seems when qualify the schemaname the the "tbinfo->interesting" field
    > > is not setted for extensions objects, so the getTableAttrs can't fill
    > > the attgenerated field properly.
    > >
    > > I'm not 100% sure it's the correct way but the attached patch works
    > > for me and all tests passed. Maybe we should add more TAP tests?
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > I just tried this patch out on master, with the test case I gave
    > upthread. It's not working, still getting a segfault.
    >
    
    Ohh really sorry about it... my bad... i completely forgot about it!!!
    
    Due to my rush I ended up adding the wrong patch version. Attached the
    correct version.
    
    Will add TAP tests to src/test/modules/test_pg_dump
    
    Regards,
    
    --
       Fabrízio de Royes Mello         Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
       PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
    
  8. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2020-07-13T17:37:50Z

    On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:52 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
    fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 8:07 PM Andrew Dunstan <
    andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > On 6/26/20 2:10 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    > > >
    > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello
    > > > <fabriziomello@gmail.com <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:24 AM Andrew Dunstan
    > > > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > > > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > > > > It appears that for extension owned tables tbinfo.attgenerated
    isn't
    > > > > > > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which
    > > > is line
    > > > > > > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Having a look on it.
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > Seems when qualify the schemaname the the "tbinfo->interesting" field
    > > > is not setted for extensions objects, so the getTableAttrs can't fill
    > > > the attgenerated field properly.
    > > >
    > > > I'm not 100% sure it's the correct way but the attached patch works
    > > > for me and all tests passed. Maybe we should add more TAP tests?
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > > I just tried this patch out on master, with the test case I gave
    > > upthread. It's not working, still getting a segfault.
    > >
    >
    > Ohh really sorry about it... my bad... i completely forgot about it!!!
    >
    > Due to my rush I ended up adding the wrong patch version. Attached the
    correct version.
    >
    > Will add TAP tests to src/test/modules/test_pg_dump
    >
    
    Attached the patch including TAP tests.
    
    Regards,
    
    --
       Fabrízio de Royes Mello         Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
       PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
    
  9. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-07-13T18:29:14Z

    On 7/13/20 10:52 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    >
    > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 8:07 PM Andrew Dunstan
    > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > On 6/26/20 2:10 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    > > >
    > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello
    > > > <fabriziomello@gmail.com <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com>
    > <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com>>> wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:24 AM Andrew Dunstan
    > > > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
    > > > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>>> wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > > > > It appears that for extension owned tables
    > tbinfo.attgenerated isn't
    > > > > > > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which
    > > > is line
    > > > > > > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Having a look on it.
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > Seems when qualify the schemaname the the "tbinfo->interesting" field
    > > > is not setted for extensions objects, so the getTableAttrs can't fill
    > > > the attgenerated field properly.
    > > >
    > > > I'm not 100% sure it's the correct way but the attached patch works
    > > > for me and all tests passed. Maybe we should add more TAP tests?
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > > I just tried this patch out on master, with the test case I gave
    > > upthread. It's not working, still getting a segfault.
    > >
    >
    > Ohh really sorry about it... my bad... i completely forgot about it!!!
    >
    > Due to my rush I ended up adding the wrong patch version. Attached the
    > correct version.
    >
    > Will add TAP tests to src/test/modules/test_pg_dump
    
    
    yeah, that's the fix I came up with too. The only thing I added was
    "Assert(tbinfo->attgenerated);" at about line 2097.
    
    
    Will wait for your TAP tests.
    
    
    thanks
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    -- 
    Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
    
  10. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2020-07-13T18:46:18Z

    On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:29 PM Andrew Dunstan <
    andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > On 7/13/20 10:52 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    > >
    > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 8:07 PM Andrew Dunstan
    > > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > On 6/26/20 2:10 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello
    > > > > <fabriziomello@gmail.com <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com>
    > > <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com <mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com>>>
    wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:24 AM Andrew Dunstan
    > > > > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
    > > > > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com
    > > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>>> wrote:
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > On 6/26/20 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > > > > > It appears that for extension owned tables
    > > tbinfo.attgenerated isn't
    > > > > > > > being properly populated, so line 2050 in REL_12_STABLE, which
    > > > > is line
    > > > > > > > 2109 in git tip, is failing.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Should have mentioned this is in src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
    > > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Having a look on it.
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Seems when qualify the schemaname the the "tbinfo->interesting"
    field
    > > > > is not setted for extensions objects, so the getTableAttrs can't
    fill
    > > > > the attgenerated field properly.
    > > > >
    > > > > I'm not 100% sure it's the correct way but the attached patch works
    > > > > for me and all tests passed. Maybe we should add more TAP tests?
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > I just tried this patch out on master, with the test case I gave
    > > > upthread. It's not working, still getting a segfault.
    > > >
    > >
    > > Ohh really sorry about it... my bad... i completely forgot about it!!!
    > >
    > > Due to my rush I ended up adding the wrong patch version. Attached the
    > > correct version.
    > >
    > > Will add TAP tests to src/test/modules/test_pg_dump
    >
    >
    > yeah, that's the fix I came up with too. The only thing I added was
    > "Assert(tbinfo->attgenerated);" at about line 2097.
    >
    
    Cool.
    
    >
    > Will wait for your TAP tests.
    >
    
    Actually I've sent it already but it seems to have gone to the moderation
    queue.
    
    Anyway attached with your assertion and TAP tests.
    
    Regards,
    
    --
       Fabrízio de Royes Mello         Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
       PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
    
  11. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-07-13T20:05:20Z

    On 7/13/20 2:46 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    >
    >
    > >
    > > yeah, that's the fix I came up with too. The only thing I added was
    > > "Assert(tbinfo->attgenerated);" at about line 2097.
    > >
    >
    > Cool.
    >
    > >
    > > Will wait for your TAP tests.
    > >
    >
    > Actually I've sent it already but it seems to have gone to the
    > moderation queue.
    >
    > Anyway attached with your assertion and TAP tests.
    >
    >
    
    
    
    Thanks, that all seems fine. The TAP test changes are a bit of a pain in
    the neck before release 11, so I think I'll just do those back that far,
    but the main fix for all live branches.
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    -- 
    Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
    
  12. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2020-07-13T21:18:37Z

    On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:05 PM Andrew Dunstan <
    andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > On 7/13/20 2:46 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > > yeah, that's the fix I came up with too. The only thing I added was
    > > > "Assert(tbinfo->attgenerated);" at about line 2097.
    > > >
    > >
    > > Cool.
    > >
    > > >
    > > > Will wait for your TAP tests.
    > > >
    > >
    > > Actually I've sent it already but it seems to have gone to the
    > > moderation queue.
    > >
    > > Anyway attached with your assertion and TAP tests.
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > Thanks, that all seems fine. The TAP test changes are a bit of a pain in
    > the neck before release 11, so I think I'll just do those back that far,
    > but the main fix for all live branches.
    >
    
    Sounds good to me.
    
    --
       Fabrízio de Royes Mello         Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
       PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
    
  13. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2020-08-06T20:11:49Z

    On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 6:18 PM Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
    fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
    
    >
    > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:05 PM Andrew Dunstan <
    > andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > On 7/13/20 2:46 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > yeah, that's the fix I came up with too. The only thing I added was
    > > > > "Assert(tbinfo->attgenerated);" at about line 2097.
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > Cool.
    > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Will wait for your TAP tests.
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > Actually I've sent it already but it seems to have gone to the
    > > > moderation queue.
    > > >
    > > > Anyway attached with your assertion and TAP tests.
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Thanks, that all seems fine. The TAP test changes are a bit of a pain in
    > > the neck before release 11, so I think I'll just do those back that far,
    > > but the main fix for all live branches.
    > >
    >
    > Sounds good to me.
    >
    >
    Just added to the next commitfest [1] to make sure we'll not lose it.
    
    Regards,
    
    [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2671/
    
    -- 
       Fabrízio de Royes Mello         Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
       PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
    
  14. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-09-04T18:00:13Z

    On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:12 PM Fabrízio de Royes Mello
    <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 6:18 PM Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:05 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > On 7/13/20 2:46 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > > >
    >> > > > yeah, that's the fix I came up with too. The only thing I added was
    >> > > > "Assert(tbinfo->attgenerated);" at about line 2097.
    >> > > >
    >> > >
    >> > > Cool.
    >> > >
    >> > > >
    >> > > > Will wait for your TAP tests.
    >> > > >
    >> > >
    >> > > Actually I've sent it already but it seems to have gone to the
    >> > > moderation queue.
    >> > >
    >> > > Anyway attached with your assertion and TAP tests.
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > Thanks, that all seems fine. The TAP test changes are a bit of a pain in
    >> > the neck before release 11, so I think I'll just do those back that far,
    >> > but the main fix for all live branches.
    >> >
    >>
    >> Sounds good to me.
    >>
    >
    > Just added to the next commitfest [1] to make sure we'll not lose it.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2671/
    >
    
    
    Thanks, Committed. Further investigation shows this was introduced in
    release 12, so that's how far back I went.
    
    cheers
    
    andrew
    
    
    -- 
    Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
  15. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2020-09-04T19:10:53Z

    On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:00 PM Andrew Dunstan <
    andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > Thanks, Committed. Further investigation shows this was introduced in
    > release 12, so that's how far back I went.
    >
    
    Thanks!
    
    --
       Fabrízio de Royes Mello         Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
       PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
    
  16. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2020-10-06T21:19:53Z

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    > Thanks, Committed. Further investigation shows this was introduced in
    > release 12, so that's how far back I went.
    
    Still further investigation shows that this patch caused bug #16655 [1].
    It should *not* have been designed to unconditionally clear the
    table's "interesting" flag, as there may have been other reasons
    why that was set.  The right way to think about it is "if we are
    going to dump the table's data, then the table certainly needs its
    interesting flag set, so that we'll collect the per-attribute info.
    Otherwise leave well enough alone".
    
    The patches I proposed in the other thread seem like they really ought
    to go all the way back for safety's sake.  However, I do not observe
    any crash on the test case in v11, and I'm kind of wondering why not.
    Did you identify exactly where this was "introduced in release 12"?
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/16655-5c92d6b3a9438137%40postgresql.org
    
    
    
    
  17. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-10-07T12:46:03Z

    On 10/6/20 5:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
    > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    >> Thanks, Committed. Further investigation shows this was introduced in
    >> release 12, so that's how far back I went.
    > Still further investigation shows that this patch caused bug #16655 [1].
    > It should *not* have been designed to unconditionally clear the
    > table's "interesting" flag, as there may have been other reasons
    > why that was set.  The right way to think about it is "if we are
    > going to dump the table's data, then the table certainly needs its
    > interesting flag set, so that we'll collect the per-attribute info.
    > Otherwise leave well enough alone".
    
    
    
    Yes, I see the issue. Mea culpa :-(
    
    
    
    >
    > The patches I proposed in the other thread seem like they really ought
    > to go all the way back for safety's sake.  However, I do not observe
    > any crash on the test case in v11, and I'm kind of wondering why not.
    > Did you identify exactly where this was "introduced in release 12"?
    
    
    
    It looks like you've since discovered the cause here. Do you need me to
    dig more?
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    -- 
    Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
    
  18. Re: pg_dump bug for extension owned tables

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2020-10-07T13:37:01Z

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    > It looks like you've since discovered the cause here. Do you need me to
    > dig more?
    
    Nah, I've got it.  Thanks.
    
    			regards, tom lane