Thread

Commits

  1. Add missing check of noError parameter in euc_tw_and_big5.c

  2. Add 'noError' argument to encoding conversion functions.

  1. add 'noError' to euc_tw_and_big5.c

    wangyukun@fujitsu.com <wangyukun@fujitsu.com> — 2021-07-21T02:15:14Z

    Hi, Heikki
    
    'noError' argument was added at commit ea1b99a661,
    but it seems to be neglected in euc_tw_and_big5.c Line 289.
    please see the attachment.
    
    Regards,
    Yukun Wang
    
  2. Re: add 'noError' to euc_tw_and_big5.c

    Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2021-07-21T02:35:33Z

    On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:15:14AM +0000, wangyukun@fujitsu.com wrote:
    > 'noError' argument was added at commit ea1b99a661,
    > but it seems to be neglected in euc_tw_and_big5.c Line 289.
    > please see the attachment.
    
    That sounds right to me.  Double-checking the area, I am not seeing
    another portion of the code to fix.
    --
    Michael
    
  3. Re: add 'noError' to euc_tw_and_big5.c

    John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> — 2021-07-21T11:44:06Z

    On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
    wrote:
    >
    > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:15:14AM +0000, wangyukun@fujitsu.com wrote:
    > > 'noError' argument was added at commit ea1b99a661,
    > > but it seems to be neglected in euc_tw_and_big5.c Line 289.
    > > please see the attachment.
    >
    > That sounds right to me.  Double-checking the area, I am not seeing
    > another portion of the code to fix.
    
    Agreed, will push.
    
    --
    John Naylor
    EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    
  4. Re: add 'noError' to euc_tw_and_big5.c

    John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> — 2021-07-21T13:47:31Z

    On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
    wrote:
    >
    > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:15:14AM +0000, wangyukun@fujitsu.com wrote:
    > > 'noError' argument was added at commit ea1b99a661,
    > > but it seems to be neglected in euc_tw_and_big5.c Line 289.
    > > please see the attachment.
    >
    > That sounds right to me.  Double-checking the area, I am not seeing
    > another portion of the code to fix.
    
    Pushed, but I forgot to give you review credit, sorry about that. Thanks
    for taking a look!
    
    --
    John Naylor
    EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com