Horton

Thread

Commits

  1. Remove master/slave usage from plpgsql tests

  1. Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

    Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> — 2019-06-19T12:35:02Z

    A Twitter thread today regarding the use of master/slave [1] made me curious
and so I had a look.  It seems that commit a1ef920e27ba6ab3602aaf6d6751d8628
replaced most instances but missed at least one which is fixed in the attached.

cheers ./daniel

[1] https://twitter.com/Xof/status/1141040942645776384

  2. Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

    Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> — 2019-06-19T12:39:24Z

    On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 2:35 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:

> A Twitter thread today regarding the use of master/slave [1] made me
> curious
> and so I had a look.  It seems that commit
> a1ef920e27ba6ab3602aaf6d6751d8628
> replaced most instances but missed at least one which is fixed in the
> attached.
>

Applied, thanks.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

  3. Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

    Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> — 2019-06-19T17:04:27Z

    Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:

> A Twitter thread today regarding the use of master/slave [1] made me curious
> and so I had a look.  It seems that commit a1ef920e27ba6ab3602aaf6d6751d8628
> replaced most instances but missed at least one which is fixed in the attached.
>
> cheers ./daniel

There were some more master/slave references in the plpgsql foreign key
tests, which the attached chages to base/leaf instead.

I didn't touch the last mention of "slave", in the pltcl code, because
it's calling the Tcl_CreateSlave() API function.

- ilmari
-- 
"The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law
"Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with
 the consequences of."                              -- Skud's Meta-Law

  4. Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> — 2019-08-21T10:06:21Z

    On 2019-06-19 19:04, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> There were some more master/slave references in the plpgsql foreign key
> tests, which the attached chages to base/leaf instead.

base/leaf doesn't sound like a good pair.  I committed it with root/leaf
instead.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

  5. Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

    Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> — 2019-08-21T13:54:25Z

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

> On 2019-06-19 19:04, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> There were some more master/slave references in the plpgsql foreign key
>> tests, which the attached chages to base/leaf instead.
>
> base/leaf doesn't sound like a good pair.  I committed it with root/leaf
> instead.

Thanks!  You're right, that is a better name pair.

- ilmari
-- 
"A disappointingly low fraction of the human race is,
 at any given time, on fire." - Stig Sandbeck Mathisen