Re: Remove one last occurrence of "replication slave" in comments

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:

> A Twitter thread today regarding the use of master/slave [1] made me curious
> and so I had a look.  It seems that commit a1ef920e27ba6ab3602aaf6d6751d8628
> replaced most instances but missed at least one which is fixed in the attached.
>
> cheers ./daniel

There were some more master/slave references in the plpgsql foreign key
tests, which the attached chages to base/leaf instead.

I didn't touch the last mention of "slave", in the pltcl code, because
it's calling the Tcl_CreateSlave() API function.

- ilmari
-- 
"The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law
"Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with
 the consequences of."                              -- Skud's Meta-Law