Thread
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix out-of-date comment on makeRangeConstructors
- abb331da0a34 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix out-of-date comment on makeRangeConstructors
Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> — 2025-12-04T22:34:17Z
Hi Hackers, I noticed that makeRangeConstructors (in commands/typecmds.c) says: > We actually define 4 functions, with 0 through 3 arguments. But that hasn't been true since 2011 (df73584431). We only have 2-arg and 3-arg functions. Here is a quick patch to update the comment. Yours, -- Paul ~{:-) pj@illuminatedcomputing.com -
Re: Fix out-of-date comment on makeRangeConstructors
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> — 2025-12-05T02:26:19Z
> On Dec 5, 2025, at 06:34, Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote: > > Hi Hackers, > > I noticed that makeRangeConstructors (in commands/typecmds.c) says: > >> We actually define 4 functions, with 0 through 3 arguments. > > But that hasn't been true since 2011 (df73584431). We only have 2-arg > and 3-arg functions. Here is a quick patch to update the comment. > > Yours, > > -- > Paul ~{:-) > pj@illuminatedcomputing.com > <v1-0001-Fix-out-of-date-comment-on-makeRangeConstructors.patch> I think the fix is reasonable, which reflects to the current code: ``` static const char *const prosrc[2] = {"range_constructor2", "range_constructor3"}; static const int pronargs[2] = {2, 3}; ``` Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/ -
Re: Fix out-of-date comment on makeRangeConstructors
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> — 2025-12-13T15:57:36Z
On 05.12.25 03:26, Chao Li wrote: >> On Dec 5, 2025, at 06:34, Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote: >> I noticed that makeRangeConstructors (in commands/typecmds.c) says: >> >>> We actually define 4 functions, with 0 through 3 arguments. >> >> But that hasn't been true since 2011 (df73584431). We only have 2-arg >> and 3-arg functions. Here is a quick patch to update the comment. > > I think the fix is reasonable, which reflects to the current code: > > ``` > static const char *const prosrc[2] = {"range_constructor2", > "range_constructor3"}; > static const int pronargs[2] = {2, 3}; > ``` committed