Horton

Thread

  1. log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2010-12-23T21:09:54Z

    Somehow I fantasized that log_hostname would also turn
pg_stat_activity.client_addr into names instead of IP addresses.  It
doesn't, but perhaps it should?  It would be nice to be able to
configure an IP-address free setup.  Or would it be worth having a
separate configuration parameter for that?

  2. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> — 2010-12-23T21:21:20Z

    On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 22:09, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Somehow I fantasized that log_hostname would also turn
> pg_stat_activity.client_addr into names instead of IP addresses.  It
> doesn't, but perhaps it should?  It would be nice to be able to
> configure an IP-address free setup.  Or would it be worth having a
> separate configuration parameter for that?

It should certainly be renamed to something else if it does both, but
I don't see the point of having two separate parameters between them.
As long as you can use a cached version of the lookup, you're only
paying the price once, after all...

However, pg_stat_activity.client_addr is an inet field, not a text
string, so you'd have to invent a separate field for it I think...

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

  3. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2011-01-15T16:15:45Z

    On tor, 2010-12-23 at 22:21 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 22:09, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Somehow I fantasized that log_hostname would also turn
> > pg_stat_activity.client_addr into names instead of IP addresses.  It
> > doesn't, but perhaps it should?  It would be nice to be able to
> > configure an IP-address free setup.  Or would it be worth having a
> > separate configuration parameter for that?
> 
> It should certainly be renamed to something else if it does both, but
> I don't see the point of having two separate parameters between them.
> As long as you can use a cached version of the lookup, you're only
> paying the price once, after all...
> 
> However, pg_stat_activity.client_addr is an inet field, not a text
> string, so you'd have to invent a separate field for it I think...

Here is a patch that adds a client_hostname field to pg_stat_activity.
It takes the hostname if it is available either by having log_hostname
set or if the pg_hba.conf processing resolved it.  So I think for most
people who would care about this thing, it would "just work".

I'm not so sure about the pgstat.c internals.  Do we need the separate
buffer in shared memory, as in this patch, or could we just copy the
name directly into the PgBackendStatus struct?  I guess not the latter,
since my compiler complains about copying a string into a volatile
pointer.

  4. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> — 2011-01-17T20:43:57Z

    Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of sáb ene 15 13:15:45 -0300 2011:

> Here is a patch that adds a client_hostname field to pg_stat_activity.
> It takes the hostname if it is available either by having log_hostname
> set or if the pg_hba.conf processing resolved it.  So I think for most
> people who would care about this thing, it would "just work".
> 
> I'm not so sure about the pgstat.c internals.  Do we need the separate
> buffer in shared memory, as in this patch, or could we just copy the
> name directly into the PgBackendStatus struct?  I guess not the latter,
> since my compiler complains about copying a string into a volatile
> pointer.

I think you should do it like clientaddr is handled: fill a string with
the value from MyProcPort, then make the PgBackendStatus point to that.

BTW you need to touch BackendStatusShmemSize if you change the routine
below that (but AFAIU that should be taken out).

...

I'm confused ... why isn't this code broken?  I don't understand why
isn't clientaddr clobbered the next time someone uses the stack space,
given that it's not allocated anywhere.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

  5. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca> — 2011-01-19T00:24:25Z

    Here is my review for this patch


Submission Review
----------------
-Patch applies cleanly

-Patch does not include documentation changes.  At a minimum: update the 
table that lists what pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication includes 
in monitoring.sgml but I propose more below.

-No tests are included but writing unit tests that depend on produce the 
same output involving the hostname of the client is not possible.


Usability review
----------------

See my comments below in the testing section. The patch does do what it 
says but the log_hostname issue is a usability issue (it not being 
obvious why you get only null owhen log_hostname is turned off). 
Documenting it might be fine.  If log_hostname were new to 9.1 I would 
encourage renaming it to something that implies it does more than just 
control logging output but I don't see this as a good enough reason to 
rename a parameter.

I think being able to see the hostnames connections in pg_stat_activity 
come from is useful and it is a feature we don't already have.



Feature Test
----------------

If my connection is authorized through a line in pg_hba that uses 
client_hostname then the column shows what I expect even with 
log_hostname set to off.

However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP network 
then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is set to 
true.  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I think the 
average user will find it a bit confusing.  Having a column that is 
always null unless a GUC is set is less than ideal but I understand why 
log_hostname isn't on by default.

I would be inclined to add an entry for these views in catalogs.sgml 
that where we can then give users a pointer that they need to set 
log_hostname to get anything out of this column.

If I connect through unix sockets (say psql -h /tmp --port 5433)
I was also expecting to see "[local]" in client_hostname but I am just 
getting NULL.  This this lookup is static I don't see why it should be 
dependent on log_hostname (even with log_hostname set I'm not seeing 
[local])

I have not tested this with ipv6

Performance Review
------------------
The lookup is done when the connection is established not each time the 
view is queried.  I don't see any performance issues


Coding Review
-------------

As Alvaro pointed out BackendStatusShmemSize should be updated.

To answer his question about why clientaddr works:  clientaddr is a 
SockAddr which is a structure not a pointer so the data gets copied by 
value to beentry.   That won't work for strings,  I have no issues with 
how your allocating space in beentry and then strlcpy'ing the values.

I see no issues with the implementation

I'm marking this as 'Waiting for Author' pending documentation changes 
and maybe a fix the behaviour with unix sockets

Steve

  6. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> — 2011-01-19T01:07:28Z

    Excerpts from Steve Singer's message of mar ene 18 21:24:25 -0300 2011:

> Coding Review
> -------------
> 
> As Alvaro pointed out BackendStatusShmemSize should be updated.
> 
> To answer his question about why clientaddr works:  clientaddr is a 
> SockAddr which is a structure not a pointer so the data gets copied by 
> value to beentry.   That won't work for strings,  I have no issues with 
> how your allocating space in beentry and then strlcpy'ing the values.

Doh, of course.  Thanks.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

  7. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2011-01-30T20:03:35Z

    On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> If my connection is authorized through a line in pg_hba that uses
> client_hostname then the column shows what I expect even with log_hostname
> set to off.
>
> However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP network
> then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is set to true.
>  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I think the average
> user will find it a bit confusing.

I agree.  I'm not sure there's enough value to this feature to warrant
the amount of user confusion this is likely to produce.

But if we're going to do it anyway we at least need to do this:

> I would be inclined to add an entry for these views in catalogs.sgml that
> where we can then give users a pointer that they need to set log_hostname to
> get anything out of this column.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

  8. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2011-01-30T21:30:05Z

    On sön, 2011-01-30 at 15:03 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Steve Singer
> <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > If my connection is authorized through a line in pg_hba that uses
> > client_hostname then the column shows what I expect even with
> log_hostname
> > set to off.
> >
> > However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
> network
> > then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is set to
> true.
> >  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I think the
> average
> > user will find it a bit confusing.
> 
> I agree.  I'm not sure there's enough value to this feature to warrant
> the amount of user confusion this is likely to produce.

What alternative behavior would you suggest?

  9. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2011-01-30T22:12:35Z

    On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On sön, 2011-01-30 at 15:03 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Steve Singer
>> <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> > If my connection is authorized through a line in pg_hba that uses
>> > client_hostname then the column shows what I expect even with
>> log_hostname
>> > set to off.
>> >
>> > However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
>> network
>> > then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is set to
>> true.
>> >  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I think the
>> average
>> > user will find it a bit confusing.
>>
>> I agree.  I'm not sure there's enough value to this feature to warrant
>> the amount of user confusion this is likely to produce.
>
> What alternative behavior would you suggest?

I don't know.  As I said in my previous email, I'd either (a) forget
the whole thing or (b) make sure that the documentation is *extremely*
explicit about what the behavior is.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

  10. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2011-02-01T18:09:44Z

    On tis, 2011-01-18 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
> However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
> network then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is
> set to true.  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I
> think the average user will find it a bit confusing.  Having a column
> that is always null unless a GUC is set is less than ideal but I
> understand why log_hostname isn't on by default. 

Well, we have all these track_* variables, which also control what
appears in the statistics views.

After thinking about this some more, I think it might be better to be
less cute and forget about the interaction with the pg_hba.conf hostname
behavior.  That is, the host name is set if and only if log_hostname is
on.  Otherwise you will for example have an inconsistency between the
statistics views and the server log, unless you want to argue that we
can override the log_hostname setting based on what happens in
pg_hba.conf.  That's just getting too weird.

  11. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2011-02-01T18:33:56Z

    On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On tis, 2011-01-18 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
>> However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
>> network then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is
>> set to true.  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I
>> think the average user will find it a bit confusing.  Having a column
>> that is always null unless a GUC is set is less than ideal but I
>> understand why log_hostname isn't on by default.
>
> Well, we have all these track_* variables, which also control what
> appears in the statistics views.
>
> After thinking about this some more, I think it might be better to be
> less cute and forget about the interaction with the pg_hba.conf hostname
> behavior.  That is, the host name is set if and only if log_hostname is
> on.

+1 for doing it that way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

  12. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2011-02-10T15:13:05Z

    On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> On tis, 2011-01-18 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
>>> However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
>>> network then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is
>>> set to true.  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I
>>> think the average user will find it a bit confusing.  Having a column
>>> that is always null unless a GUC is set is less than ideal but I
>>> understand why log_hostname isn't on by default.
>>
>> Well, we have all these track_* variables, which also control what
>> appears in the statistics views.
>>
>> After thinking about this some more, I think it might be better to be
>> less cute and forget about the interaction with the pg_hba.conf hostname
>> behavior.  That is, the host name is set if and only if log_hostname is
>> on.
>
> +1 for doing it that way.

I think there are no outstanding issues with this patch of any
significance, so I'm marking it Ready for Committer.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

  13. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca> — 2011-02-10T15:22:53Z

    On 11-02-10 10:13 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net>  wrote:
>>> On tis, 2011-01-18 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
>>>> However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
>>>> network then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is
>>>> set to true.  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I
>>>> think the average user will find it a bit confusing.  Having a column
>>>> that is always null unless a GUC is set is less than ideal but I
>>>> understand why log_hostname isn't on by default.
>>> Well, we have all these track_* variables, which also control what
>>> appears in the statistics views.
>>>
>>> After thinking about this some more, I think it might be better to be
>>> less cute and forget about the interaction with the pg_hba.conf hostname
>>> behavior.  That is, the host name is set if and only if log_hostname is
>>> on.
>> +1 for doing it that way.
> I think there are no outstanding issues with this patch of any
> significance, so I'm marking it Ready for Committer.
>
Was there an uodated version of this patch I missed?

The original patch needed some sort of documentation saying that having 
something showup in the new pg_stat_activity columns is controlled by 
log_hostname.

Above Peter and you seem to agree that having the having the line 
matched in pg_hba being a controlling factor should be removed but I 
haven't seen an updated patch that implements that.

  14. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2011-02-10T15:32:31Z

    On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> On 11-02-10 10:13 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On tis, 2011-01-18 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
>>>>> network then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is
>>>>> set to true.  This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I
>>>>> think the average user will find it a bit confusing.  Having a column
>>>>> that is always null unless a GUC is set is less than ideal but I
>>>>> understand why log_hostname isn't on by default.
>>>>
>>>> Well, we have all these track_* variables, which also control what
>>>> appears in the statistics views.
>>>>
>>>> After thinking about this some more, I think it might be better to be
>>>> less cute and forget about the interaction with the pg_hba.conf hostname
>>>> behavior.  That is, the host name is set if and only if log_hostname is
>>>> on.
>>>
>>> +1 for doing it that way.
>>
>> I think there are no outstanding issues with this patch of any
>> significance, so I'm marking it Ready for Committer.
>>
> Was there an uodated version of this patch I missed?
>
> The original patch needed some sort of documentation saying that having
> something showup in the new pg_stat_activity columns is controlled by
> log_hostname.
>
> Above Peter and you seem to agree that having the having the line matched in
> pg_hba being a controlling factor should be removed but I haven't seen an
> updated patch that implements that.

I was assuming those changes were sufficiently trivial that they could
be made at commit-time, especially if Peter is committing it himself.
Of course if he'd like a re-review, he can always post an updated
patch, but I just thought that was overly pedantic in this particular
case.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

  15. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca> — 2011-02-10T15:40:23Z

    On 11-02-10 10:32 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> I was assuming those changes were sufficiently trivial that they could
> be made at commit-time, especially if Peter is committing it himself.
> Of course if he'd like a re-review, he can always post an updated
> patch, but I just thought that was overly pedantic in this particular
> case.
>

Sounds reasonable.

  16. Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2011-02-17T01:59:10Z

    On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> On 11-02-10 10:32 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I was assuming those changes were sufficiently trivial that they could
>> be made at commit-time, especially if Peter is committing it himself.
>> Of course if he'd like a re-review, he can always post an updated
>> patch, but I just thought that was overly pedantic in this particular
>> case.
>
> Sounds reasonable.

I rebased this patch, wrote documentation, and fixed
BackendStatusShmemSize.  PFA.

On further review, I'm inclined to go with Peter's original approach
to displaying the hostname: show it if we have it, and don't if we
don't.  It's not that hard to document the relevant criteria, and it
seems silly to suppress the information if we have it.

I had a thought of declaring st_clienthostname as char
st_clienthostname[NAMEDATALEN] rather than char *st_clienthostname.
That would simplify the initialization code.  But I believe that the
protocol used for updating this data structure is unsafe unless the
whole thing fits into a single cache line.  I'm not positive that's
going to be true on every architecture even as things stand.  On my
Mac, with this patch, it's 208 bytes (which means that it's presumably
200 without the patch, and that it would be 264 with the alternate
approach proposed above).  According to that font of knowledge,
Wikipedia, the size of a cache line can vary from 8 to 512 bytes
[citation needed].

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company