Thread

Commits

  1. Avoid redundant checks in partition_bounds_copy().

  1. Minor improvement to partition_bounds_copy()

    Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> — 2020-02-20T11:36:10Z

    partition_bounds_copy() sets the hash_part and natts variable in each
    iteration of a loop to copy the datums in the datums array, which
    would not be efficient.  Attached is small patch for avoiding that.
    
    Best regards,
    Etsuro Fujita
    
  2. Re: Minor improvement to partition_bounds_copy()

    Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> — 2020-02-20T12:38:26Z

    Fujita-san,
    
    On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:36 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
    > partition_bounds_copy() sets the hash_part and natts variable in each
    > iteration of a loop to copy the datums in the datums array, which
    > would not be efficient.  Attached is small patch for avoiding that.
    
    That looks good to me.
    
    Thanks,
    Amit
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Minor improvement to partition_bounds_copy()

    Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> — 2020-02-20T13:52:29Z

    On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:38:26PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
    > Fujita-san,
    >
    > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:36 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
    > > partition_bounds_copy() sets the hash_part and natts variable in each
    > > iteration of a loop to copy the datums in the datums array, which
    > > would not be efficient.  Attached is small patch for avoiding that.
    >
    > That looks good to me.
    
    Looks good to me too!
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: Minor improvement to partition_bounds_copy()

    Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> — 2020-02-21T11:06:31Z

    On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:52 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
    > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:38:26PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
    > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:36 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
    > > > partition_bounds_copy() sets the hash_part and natts variable in each
    > > > iteration of a loop to copy the datums in the datums array, which
    > > > would not be efficient.  Attached is small patch for avoiding that.
    > >
    > > That looks good to me.
    >
    > Looks good to me too!
    
    Pushed.  Thanks, Amit and Julien!
    
    Best regards,
    Etsuro Fujita