Thread
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Run regression tests with timezone America/Los_Angeles.
- b28b9b19bbe3 13.17 landed
- b27622c90869 14.14 landed
- 2b94ee58bf25 15.9 landed
- 2abc88958039 16.5 landed
- 205813da4c26 12.21 landed
- b8ea0f675f35 18.0 landed
- 6283ff2018e3 17.0 landed
-
Don't require bleeding-edge timezone data in timestamptz regression test.
- 8d7af8fbe734 9.5.0 cited
-
Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> — 2024-09-14T13:02:38Z
Building --with-system-tzdata and the latest tzdata 2024b fails the regression tests for me (see attached .diffs). This seems to be because of [1], which changed the way "PST8PDT" is handled. This is the timezone that the regression tests are run with. From 2024b on, "PST8PDT" is the same as "America/Los_Angeles", so by changing the regression tests to use the latter as the default, we're getting consistent output on at least 2024a and 2024b. Patch attached. Best, Wolfgang [1]: https://github.com/eggert/tz/commit/a0b09c0230089252acf2eb0f1ba922e99f7f4a03
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2024-09-14T20:37:19Z
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> writes: > Building --with-system-tzdata and the latest tzdata 2024b fails the > regression tests for me (see attached .diffs). This seems to be because > of [1], which changed the way "PST8PDT" is handled. This is the timezone > that the regression tests are run with. That's quite annoying, especially since it was not mentioned in the 2024b release notes. (I had read the notes and concluded that 2024b didn't require any immediate attention on our part.) > From 2024b on, "PST8PDT" is the same as "America/Los_Angeles", so by > changing the regression tests to use the latter as the default, we're > getting consistent output on at least 2024a and 2024b. I'm fairly un-thrilled with this answer, not least because it exposes that zone's idiosyncratic "LMT" offset of -7:52:58 for years before 1883. (I'm surprised that that seems to affect only one or two regression results.) Also, as a real place to a greater extent than "PST8PDT" is, it's more subject to historical revisionism when somebody turns up evidence of local law having been different than TZDB currently thinks. We may not have a lot of choice though. I experimented with using full POSIX notation, that is "PST8PDT,M3.2.0,M11.1.0", but that is actually worse in terms of the number of test diffs, since it doesn't match the DST transition dates that the tests expect for years before 2007. Another objection is that the tests would then not exercise any of the mainstream tzdb-file-reading code paths within the timezone code itself. Grumble. regards, tom lane
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> — 2024-09-15T09:08:11Z
Tom Lane: > Also, as a real place to a greater extent > than "PST8PDT" is, it's more subject to historical revisionism when > somebody turns up evidence of local law having been different than > TZDB currently thinks. I now tried all versions of tzdata which we had in tree back to 2018g, they all work fine with the same regression test output. 2018g was an arbitrary cutoff, I just didn't try any further. In the end, we don't need a default timezone that will never change. We just need one that didn't change in a reasonable number of releases going backwards. Once America/Los_Angeles is changed, we need to switch to a different zone, which could be one that wouldn't work today. Kind of a sliding window. One positive might be: With this timezone, we are more likely to see relevant changes mentioned in the upstream release notes. Best, Wolfgang
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2024-09-16T05:09:24Z
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> writes: > Tom Lane: >> Also, as a real place to a greater extent >> than "PST8PDT" is, it's more subject to historical revisionism when >> somebody turns up evidence of local law having been different than >> TZDB currently thinks. > I now tried all versions of tzdata which we had in tree back to 2018g, > they all work fine with the same regression test output. 2018g was an > arbitrary cutoff, I just didn't try any further. Yeah, my belly-aching above is just about hypothetical future instability. In reality, I'm sure America/Los_Angeles is pretty well researched and so it's unlikely that there will be unexpected changes in its zone history. > In the end, we don't need a default timezone that will never change. We do, really. For example, there's a nonzero chance the USA will cancel DST altogether at some future time. (This would be driven by politicians who don't remember the last time, but there's no shortage of those.) That'd likely break some of our test results, and even if it happened not to, it'd still be bad because we'd probably lose some coverage of the DST-transition-related code paths in src/timezone/. So I'd really be way happier with a test timezone that never changes but does include DST behavior. I thought PST8PDT fit those requirements pretty well, and I'm annoyed at Eggert for having tossed it overboard for no benefit whatever. But I don't run tzdb, so here we are. > We just need one that didn't change in a reasonable number of > releases going backwards. We've had this sort of fire-drill before, e.g. commit 8d7af8fbe. It's no fun, and the potential surface area for unexpected changes is now much greater than the few tests affected by that change. But here we are, so I pushed your patch with a couple of other cosmetic bits. There are still a couple of references to PST8PDT in the tree, but they don't appear to care what the actual meaning of that zone is, so I left them be. regards, tom lane
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com> — 2024-09-16T08:33:56Z
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 7:09 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> writes: > > Tom Lane: > >> Also, as a real place to a greater extent > >> than "PST8PDT" is, it's more subject to historical revisionism when > >> somebody turns up evidence of local law having been different than > >> TZDB currently thinks. > > > I now tried all versions of tzdata which we had in tree back to 2018g, > > they all work fine with the same regression test output. 2018g was an > > arbitrary cutoff, I just didn't try any further. > > Yeah, my belly-aching above is just about hypothetical future > instability. In reality, I'm sure America/Los_Angeles is pretty > well researched and so it's unlikely that there will be unexpected > changes in its zone history. > > > In the end, we don't need a default timezone that will never change. > > We do, really. For example, there's a nonzero chance the USA will > cancel DST altogether at some future time. (This would be driven by > politicians who don't remember the last time, but there's no shortage > of those.) That'd likely break some of our test results, and even if > it happened not to, it'd still be bad because we'd probably lose some > coverage of the DST-transition-related code paths in src/timezone/. > So I'd really be way happier with a test timezone that never changes > but does include DST behavior. I thought PST8PDT fit those > requirements pretty well, and I'm annoyed at Eggert for having tossed > it overboard for no benefit whatever. But I don't run tzdb, so > here we are. > > > We just need one that didn't change in a reasonable number of > > releases going backwards. > > We've had this sort of fire-drill before, e.g. commit 8d7af8fbe. > It's no fun, and the potential surface area for unexpected changes > is now much greater than the few tests affected by that change. > > But here we are, so I pushed your patch with a couple of other > cosmetic bits. There are still a couple of references to PST8PDT > in the tree, but they don't appear to care what the actual meaning > of that zone is, so I left them be. > This is an unfortunate change as this will break extensions tests using pg_regress for testing. We run our tests against multiple minor versions and this getting backported means our tests will fail with the next minor pg release. Is there a workaround available to make the timezone for pg_regress configurable without going into every test? Regards, Sven Klemm
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2024-09-16T15:19:42Z
Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com> writes: > This is an unfortunate change as this will break extensions tests using > pg_regress for testing. We run our tests against multiple minor versions > and this getting backported means our tests will fail with the next minor > pg release. Is there a workaround available to make the timezone for > pg_regress configurable without going into every test? Configurable to what? If your test cases are dependent on the historical behavior of PST8PDT, you're out of luck, because that simply isn't available anymore (or won't be once 2024b reaches your platform, anyway). regards, tom lane
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com> — 2024-09-17T05:38:15Z
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 5:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Configurable to what? If your test cases are dependent on the > historical behavior of PST8PDT, you're out of luck, because that > simply isn't available anymore (or won't be once 2024b reaches > your platform, anyway). > I was wondering whether the timezone used by pg_regress could be made configurable. -- Regards, Sven Klemm
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2024-09-17T05:42:35Z
Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com> writes: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 5:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Configurable to what? If your test cases are dependent on the >> historical behavior of PST8PDT, you're out of luck, because that >> simply isn't available anymore (or won't be once 2024b reaches >> your platform, anyway). > I was wondering whether the timezone used by pg_regress could be made > configurable. Yes, I understood that you were suggesting that. My point is that it wouldn't do you any good: you will still have to change any regression test cases that depend on behavior PST8PDT has/had that is different from America/Los_Angeles. That being the case, I don't see much value in making it configurable. regards, tom lane
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> — 2024-09-17T06:39:53Z
Tom Lane: >> I was wondering whether the timezone used by pg_regress could be made >> configurable. > > Yes, I understood that you were suggesting that. My point is that > it wouldn't do you any good: you will still have to change any > regression test cases that depend on behavior PST8PDT has/had that > is different from America/Los_Angeles. That being the case, > I don't see much value in making it configurable. Just changing it back to PST8PDT wouldn't really help as Tom pointed out. You'd still get different results depending on which tzdata version you are running with. The core regression tests need to be run with a timezone that tests special cases in the timezone handling code. But that might not be true for extensions - all they want could be a stable output across major and minor versions of postgres and versions of tzdata. It could be helpful to set pg_regress' timezone to UTC, for example? Best, Wolfgang
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2024-09-17T14:15:25Z
Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> writes: > The core regression tests need to be run with a timezone that tests > special cases in the timezone handling code. But that might not be true > for extensions - all they want could be a stable output across major and > minor versions of postgres and versions of tzdata. It could be helpful > to set pg_regress' timezone to UTC, for example? I would not recommend that choice. It would mask simple errors such as failing to apply the correct conversion between timestamptz and timestamp values. Also, if you have test cases that are affected by this issue at all, you probably have a need/desire to test things like DST transitions. regards, tom lane
-
Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b
Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com> — 2024-09-18T06:04:03Z
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 4:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> writes: > > The core regression tests need to be run with a timezone that tests > > special cases in the timezone handling code. But that might not be true > > for extensions - all they want could be a stable output across major and > > minor versions of postgres and versions of tzdata. It could be helpful > > to set pg_regress' timezone to UTC, for example? > > I would not recommend that choice. It would mask simple errors such > as failing to apply the correct conversion between timestamptz and > timestamp values. Also, if you have test cases that are affected by > this issue at all, you probably have a need/desire to test things like > DST transitions. > As far as I'm aware timescaledb does not rely on specifics of tzdata version but just needs a stable setting for timezone. I guess I'll adjust our tests to not depend on upstream pg_regress timezone. -- Regards, Sven Klemm