Thread

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add regression tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped.

  1. tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped

    jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> — 2025-01-10T14:50:32Z

    hi.
    seems no regress tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped.
    
    CopyFrom
    pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED,
                                  cstate->num_errors);
    
    there is coverage for it. but in regress test, we didn't really print
    out this value (cstate->num_errors)
    
    The attached patch did minor changes on src/test/regress/sql/copy.sql.
    so we can check if pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED..)
    is working as intended or not.
    
  2. Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped

    Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> — 2025-03-03T09:05:23Z

    
    On 2025/01/10 23:50, jian he wrote:
    > hi.
    > seems no regress tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped.
    > 
    > CopyFrom
    > pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED,
    >                                cstate->num_errors);
    > 
    > there is coverage for it. but in regress test, we didn't really print
    > out this value (cstate->num_errors)
    > 
    > The attached patch did minor changes on src/test/regress/sql/copy.sql.
    > so we can check if pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED..)
    > is working as intended or not.
    
    Thanks for the patch!
    
    The patch basically looks good to me.
    I’ve made some minor cosmetic adjustments — the updated patch is attached.
    
    Unless there are any objections, I'm thinking to commit it.
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Fujii Masao
    Advanced Computing Technology Center
    Research and Development Headquarters
    NTT DATA CORPORATION
    
  3. Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped

    jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> — 2025-03-04T08:57:49Z

    On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 5:05 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
    >
    > Thanks for the patch!
    >
    > The patch basically looks good to me.
    > I’ve made some minor cosmetic adjustments — the updated patch is attached.
    >
    > Unless there are any objections, I'm thinking to commit it.
    >
    
    I checked it again manually.
    It looks good to me.
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped

    Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com> — 2025-03-04T09:40:04Z

    po 3. 3. 2025 v 10:05 odesílatel Fujii Masao
    <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> napsal:
    >
    >
    >
    > On 2025/01/10 23:50, jian he wrote:
    > > hi.
    > > seems no regress tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped.
    > >
    > > CopyFrom
    > > pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED,
    > >                                cstate->num_errors);
    > >
    > > there is coverage for it. but in regress test, we didn't really print
    > > out this value (cstate->num_errors)
    > >
    > > The attached patch did minor changes on src/test/regress/sql/copy.sql.
    > > so we can check if pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED..)
    > > is working as intended or not.
    >
    > Thanks for the patch!
    >
    > The patch basically looks good to me.
    > I’ve made some minor cosmetic adjustments — the updated patch is attached.
    >
    > Unless there are any objections, I'm thinking to commit it.
    
    Looks good to me.
    
    > Regards,
    >
    > --
    > Fujii Masao
    > Advanced Computing Technology Center
    > Research and Development Headquarters
    > NTT DATA CORPORATION
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped

    Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> — 2025-03-04T15:02:21Z

    
    On 2025/03/04 17:57, jian he wrote:
    > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 5:05 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Thanks for the patch!
    >>
    >> The patch basically looks good to me.
    >> I’ve made some minor cosmetic adjustments — the updated patch is attached.
    >>
    >> Unless there are any objections, I'm thinking to commit it.
    >>
    > 
    > I checked it again manually.
    > It looks good to me.
    
    I've pushed the patch. Thanks!
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Fujii Masao
    Advanced Computing Technology Center
    Research and Development Headquarters
    NTT DATA CORPORATION