Thread

Commits

  1. Adjust outdated comment.

  1. an outdated comment for hash_seq_init.

    Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> — 2017-04-24T07:55:41Z

    Hello.
    
    While I looked into dynahash.c, I found that the following
    sentense became outdated by 5dfc198. The commit removed the only
    usage of hash_freeze().
    
    > * NOTE: it is possible to use hash_seq_init/hash_seq_search without any
    > * worry about hash_seq_term cleanup, if the hashtable is first locked against
    > * further insertions by calling hash_freeze.  This is used by nodeAgg.c,
    > * wherein it is inconvenient to track whether a scan is still open, and
    > * there's no possibility of further insertions after readout has begun.
    
    The attached patch removes the sentence begins with "This is used
    by..".
    
    regards,
    
    -- 
    Kyotaro Horiguchi
    NTT Open Source Software Center
    
  2. Re: an outdated comment for hash_seq_init.

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2017-04-25T15:00:16Z

    On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
    <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
    > While I looked into dynahash.c, I found that the following
    > sentense became outdated by 5dfc198. The commit removed the only
    > usage of hash_freeze().
    >
    >> * NOTE: it is possible to use hash_seq_init/hash_seq_search without any
    >> * worry about hash_seq_term cleanup, if the hashtable is first locked against
    >> * further insertions by calling hash_freeze.  This is used by nodeAgg.c,
    >> * wherein it is inconvenient to track whether a scan is still open, and
    >> * there's no possibility of further insertions after readout has begun.
    >
    > The attached patch removes the sentence begins with "This is used
    > by..".
    
    Committed.
    
    -- 
    Robert Haas
    EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
    
    
    
  3. Re: an outdated comment for hash_seq_init.

    Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> — 2017-04-26T08:31:28Z

    At Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:00:16 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote in <CA+TgmobU=F1JtGZ+bL91D7sE2+cBybmJ+WMQdmTT0cyV2dvO0Q@mail.gmail.com>
    > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
    > <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
    > > While I looked into dynahash.c, I found that the following
    > > sentense became outdated by 5dfc198. The commit removed the only
    > > usage of hash_freeze().
    > >
    > >> * NOTE: it is possible to use hash_seq_init/hash_seq_search without any
    > >> * worry about hash_seq_term cleanup, if the hashtable is first locked against
    > >> * further insertions by calling hash_freeze.  This is used by nodeAgg.c,
    > >> * wherein it is inconvenient to track whether a scan is still open, and
    > >> * there's no possibility of further insertions after readout has begun.
    > >
    > > The attached patch removes the sentence begins with "This is used
    > > by..".
    > 
    > Committed.
    
    Thanks.
    
    -- 
    Kyotaro Horiguchi
    NTT Open Source Software Center