Thread

  1. Typo patch

    DaeMyung Kang <charsyam@gmail.com> — 2015-05-20T16:29:51Z

    Hi,
    
    I changed typos error. and attached patch for this.
    Thanks you.
    
    I only changed comments only
    
  2. Re: Typo patch

    Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> — 2015-05-20T16:49:29Z

    On 05/20/2015 07:29 PM, CharSyam wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I changed typos error. and attached patch for this.
    > Thanks you.
    >
    > I only changed comments only
    
    Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
    
    --- src/backend/utils/sort/logtape.c
    +++ src/backend/utils/sort/logtape.c
    @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ LogicalTapeBackspace(LogicalTapeSet *lts, int 
    tapenum, size_t size)
      /*
       * Seek to an arbitrary position in a logical tape.
       *
    - * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be seeked.
    + * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be sought.
       *
       * Return value is TRUE if seek successful, FALSE if there isn't that much
       * data in the tape (in which case there's no state change).
    
    It's true that the past tense of "seek" is "sought", but it feels a bit 
    weird to me in this context. This is a comment on a function called 
    "<blah blah>seek", and it's not clear to me that it should conjugate 
    like the normal "seek" verb.
    
    - Heikki
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Typo patch

    DaeMyung Kang <charsyam@gmail.com> — 2015-05-20T16:53:20Z

    Thanks :) You make sense.
    
    2015-05-21 1:49 GMT+09:00 Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>:
    
    > On 05/20/2015 07:29 PM, CharSyam wrote:
    >
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> I changed typos error. and attached patch for this.
    >> Thanks you.
    >>
    >> I only changed comments only
    >>
    >
    > Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
    >
    > --- src/backend/utils/sort/logtape.c
    > +++ src/backend/utils/sort/logtape.c
    > @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ LogicalTapeBackspace(LogicalTapeSet *lts, int tapenum,
    > size_t size)
    >  /*
    >   * Seek to an arbitrary position in a logical tape.
    >   *
    > - * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be seeked.
    > + * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be sought.
    >   *
    >   * Return value is TRUE if seek successful, FALSE if there isn't that much
    >   * data in the tape (in which case there's no state change).
    >
    > It's true that the past tense of "seek" is "sought", but it feels a bit
    > weird to me in this context. This is a comment on a function called "<blah
    > blah>seek", and it's not clear to me that it should conjugate like the
    > normal "seek" verb.
    >
    > - Heikki
    >
    >
    
  4. Re: Typo patch

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2015-05-20T17:05:20Z

    Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
    > Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
    
    > - * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be seeked.
    > + * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be sought.
    
    > It's true that the past tense of "seek" is "sought", but it feels a bit 
    > weird to me in this context. This is a comment on a function called 
    > "<blah blah>seek", and it's not clear to me that it should conjugate 
    > like the normal "seek" verb.
    
    I agree that "sought" is not the word to use here, but the existing
    wording isn't very good English either.  Perhaps "Seeking is only allowed
    on frozen-for-read tapes"?
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
  5. Re: Typo patch

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> — 2015-05-20T17:37:47Z

    Tom Lane wrote:
    > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
    > > Thanks, committed. Except for this one:
    > 
    > > - * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be seeked.
    > > + * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be sought.
    > 
    > > It's true that the past tense of "seek" is "sought", but it feels a bit 
    > > weird to me in this context. This is a comment on a function called 
    > > "<blah blah>seek", and it's not clear to me that it should conjugate 
    > > like the normal "seek" verb.
    > 
    > I agree that "sought" is not the word to use here, but the existing
    > wording isn't very good English either.  Perhaps "Seeking is only allowed
    > on frozen-for-read tapes"?
    
    It would be great if you could find a solution for words such as
    "shutdowned" or "backuped".  (I don't know that we use the latter in our
    code, but I've seen it around.  The former we even have in an enum
    somewhere.)
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services