Thread

  1. Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta

    Jose Soares <jose@sferacarta.com> — 2000-02-28T15:51:38Z

    
    Tom Lane wrote:
    
    > Jose Soares <jose@sferacarta.com> writes:
    > > SELECT...HAVING, this last for example doesn't work.
    >
    > That's a rather strong statement, and in fact a provably false one.
    > How about a detailed bug report rather than "it doesn't work"?
    >
    > > SELECT ... UNION (is 3 / 4 times slow)
    >
    > Can't help you on that without more details, either.  What is the
    > query exactly, what plan does EXPLAIN show, and what plan did you
    > get from 6.5?
    >
    >                         regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
    --
    Jose' Soares
    Bologna, Italy                     Jose@sferacarta.com