Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta

Tom Lane wrote:

> Jose Soares <jose@sferacarta.com> writes:
> > SELECT...HAVING, this last for example doesn't work.
>
> That's a rather strong statement, and in fact a provably false one.
> How about a detailed bug report rather than "it doesn't work"?
>
> > SELECT ... UNION (is 3 / 4 times slow)
>
> Can't help you on that without more details, either.  What is the
> query exactly, what plan does EXPLAIN show, and what plan did you
> get from 6.5?
>
>                         regards, tom lane




--
Jose' Soares
Bologna, Italy                     Jose@sferacarta.com