Thread

  1. Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()

    David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> — 2025-10-29T23:13:32Z

    On Oct 29, 2025, at 17:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    
    > In the past we've never really thought that ABI was more than mildly
    > solidified until around rc1.  On the whole I'd rather wait until after
    > the branch before starting to check ABI, simply because I don't care
    > for the idea of adding .abi-compliance-history in the master branch
    > only to remove it again later.  Having said that, it would be good
    > if we *could* choose to do that, so I still do not like having any
    > policy decisions about which branches to check hard-wired into the
    > buildfarm client.
    
    Well that’s pretty easily addressed by adding a configuration for it. Maybe a regex to match branches, defaulting to its current value[0], `/_STABLE$/`.
    
    D
    
    [0]: https://github.com/MankiratSingh1315/pg-bf-client-code/blob/abi-comp-check/PGBuild/Modules/ABICompCheck.pm#L248