Thread
-
Re: [HACKERS] The dangers of "-F"
Zeugswetter Andreas <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at> — 1999-06-24T08:07:35Z
> For instance, if there are assumptions that all data blocks are > written before this fact is recorded in a log file, then > "write data blocks" "fsynch" "write log" "fsynch" doesn't break > that assumption, > Are we really doing a sync after the pg_log write ? While the sync after datablock write seems necessary to guarantee consistency, the sync after log write is actually not necessary to guarantee consistency. Would it be a first step, to special case the writing to pg_log, as to not sync (extra switch to backend) ? This would avoid the syncs for read only transactions, since they don't cause data block writes. Andreas