Re: [HACKERS] The dangers of "-F"

Zeugswetter Andreas <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>

From: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-06-24T08:07:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> For instance, if there are assumptions that all data blocks are
> written before this fact is recorded in a log file, then
> "write data blocks" "fsynch" "write log" "fsynch" doesn't break
> that assumption, 
> 
Are we really doing a sync after the pg_log write ? While the sync
after datablock write seems necessary to guarantee consistency,
the sync after log write is actually not necessary to guarantee consistency.
Would it be a first step, to special case the writing to pg_log, as
to not sync (extra switch to backend) ? This would avoid the syncs
for read only transactions, since they don't cause data block writes.

Andreas