Thread
Commits
-
Remove argument isprimary from index_build()
- 289198c0d93a 12.0 landed
-
index_build does not need its isprimary argument
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2019-01-22T08:08:52Z
Hi all, While working on REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, I have noticed that index_build() does not need its argument isprimary. Perhaps it is not worth bothering, but for the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY business this removes the need to open an index when triggering a concurrent build. The flag was introduced in 3fdeb189, but f66e8bf actually forgot to finish the cleanup as index_update_stats() has simplified its interface. Are there any objections if I cleanup that stuff as per the attached? Thanks, -- Michael
-
Re: index_build does not need its isprimary argument
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2019-01-23T23:02:44Z
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:08:52PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > While working on REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, I have noticed that > index_build() does not need its argument isprimary. Perhaps it is > not worth bothering, but for the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY business this > removes the need to open an index when triggering a concurrent > build. > > The flag was introduced in 3fdeb189, but f66e8bf actually forgot to > finish the cleanup as index_update_stats() has simplified its > interface. And committed as of 289198c, and back to the real deal.. -- Michael