Thread
Commits
-
docs: replace dblink() mention with foreign data mention
- 255f14183ac7 11.0 landed
-
No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs
Steven Winfield <steven.winfield@cantabcapital.com> — 2017-10-31T10:50:39Z
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/textsearch-indexes.html Description: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/textsearch-indexes.html The last paragraph mentions the dblink module, but surely postgres_fdw deserves a mention here too - especially with its increasing ability to push more of the query onto the foreign servers. Also, I think it would be worth mentioning elsewhere in the documentation (e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/indexes-types.html) the impact that maintenance_work_mem has on the creation time for different index types - currently I can't find this anywhere else except on this FTS page.
-
Re: [DOCS] No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> — 2018-01-12T21:53:47Z
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:50:39AM +0000, steven.winfield@cantabcapital.com wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/textsearch-indexes.html > Description: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/textsearch-indexes.html > > The last paragraph mentions the dblink module, but surely postgres_fdw > deserves a mention here too - especially with its increasing ability to push > more of the query onto the foreign servers. > > Also, I think it would be worth mentioning elsewhere in the documentation > (e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/indexes-types.html) the > impact that maintenance_work_mem has on the creation time for different > index types - currently I can't find this anywhere else except on this FTS > page. I have applied the attached doc patch which will appear in PG 11. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +