Re: [DOCS] No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:50:39AM +0000, steven.winfield@cantabcapital.com wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/textsearch-indexes.html
> Description:
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/textsearch-indexes.html
> 
> The last paragraph mentions the dblink module, but surely postgres_fdw
> deserves a mention here too - especially with its increasing ability to push
> more of the query onto the foreign servers.
> 
> Also, I think it would be worth mentioning elsewhere in the documentation
> (e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/indexes-types.html) the
> impact that maintenance_work_mem has on the creation time for different
> index types - currently I can't find this anywhere else except on this FTS
> page.

I have applied the attached doc patch which will appear in PG 11. 
Thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +