Thread
Commits
-
Remove dedicated B-tree root-split record types.
- 0c504a80cf2e 11.0 landed
-
Make the handling of interrupted B-tree page splits more robust.
- 40dae7ec537c 9.4.0 cited
-
[PATCH] Remove unused argument in btree_xlog_split
Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru> — 2017-03-31T14:10:56Z
Hi, Turned out that there is an unused argument `isroot` in `btree_xlog_split` procedure. Suggested patch fixes it. This issue was discovered by Anastasia Lubennikova, coding is done by me. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
-
Re: [PATCH] Remove unused argument in btree_xlog_split
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2017-04-05T16:05:48Z
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > Turned out that there is an unused argument `isroot` in > `btree_xlog_split` procedure. Suggested patch fixes it. > > This issue was discovered by Anastasia Lubennikova, coding is done by me. Hmm. I don't see anything wrong with that, particularly, but it seems we also don't need the distinction between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L and XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L_ROOT or likewise between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R and XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R_ROOT -- in which case I think this patch should go a little further and do all of that together. It looks like this is fallout from Heikki's 2014 commit 40dae7ec537c5619fc93ad602c62f37be786d161, which removed log_incomplete_split(). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
-
Re: [PATCH] Remove unused argument in btree_xlog_split
Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru> — 2017-04-06T12:21:17Z
Hi Robert, > Hmm. I don't see anything wrong with that, particularly, but it seems > we also don't need the distinction between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L and > XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L_ROOT or likewise between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R and > XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R_ROOT -- in which case I think this patch should go > a little further and do all of that together. Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this patch. Here is a new version. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
-
Re: [PATCH] Remove unused argument in btree_xlog_split
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2017-04-07T18:21:02Z
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > Hi Robert, > >> Hmm. I don't see anything wrong with that, particularly, but it seems >> we also don't need the distinction between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L and >> XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L_ROOT or likewise between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R and >> XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R_ROOT -- in which case I think this patch should go >> a little further and do all of that together. > > Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this patch. Here is a new > version. Thanks. Please add this to the next CommitFest, as there seems to be no urgency (and some risk) in committing it right before feature freeze. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
-
Re: [PATCH] Remove unused argument in btree_xlog_split
Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru> — 2017-04-09T13:25:16Z
Hi Robert, > Thanks. Please add this to the next CommitFest, as there seems to be > no urgency (and some risk) in committing it right before feature > freeze. Sure. Already done [1]. [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/1097/ -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
-
Re: [PATCH] Remove unused argument in btree_xlog_split
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> — 2017-08-16T09:28:20Z
On 04/06/2017 03:21 PM, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > Hi Robert, > >> Hmm. I don't see anything wrong with that, particularly, but it seems >> we also don't need the distinction between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L and >> XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L_ROOT or likewise between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R and >> XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R_ROOT -- in which case I think this patch should go >> a little further and do all of that together. > > Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this patch. Here is a new > version. Committed, thanks. - Heikki