Thread
-
WIP: log query in auto-explain
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2009-11-22T19:57:16Z
I put the attached together a while ago and neglected to send it. Basically it includes the text of the query being explained in the explain output. I think it's more important to include the query text when using auto_explain than in other explain uses, which is why I did it this way. But I could be persuaded that we should always include it. Thoughts? Comments? cheers andrew
-
Re: WIP: log query in auto-explain
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2009-11-22T20:48:08Z
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > I put the attached together a while ago and neglected to send it. > Basically it includes the text of the query being explained in the > explain output. I'm pretty certain this will dump core in some contexts --- you should not assume that sourceText is always available. Should we be worried about security implications of displaying the query text? > I think it's more important to include the query text when using > auto_explain than in other explain uses, which is why I did it this way. > But I could be persuaded that we should always include it. I think this is just useless noise in every other case. regards, tom lane
-
Re: WIP: log query in auto-explain
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2009-11-22T23:05:28Z
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> I put the attached together a while ago and neglected to send it. >> Basically it includes the text of the query being explained in the >> explain output. >> > > I'm pretty certain this will dump core in some contexts --- you should > not assume that sourceText is always available. > Ok, I guess I can insert a check that the sourceText is not null. I wonder what we are supposed to take an explanation to mean if we can't say what it is we're explaining. > Should we be worried about security implications of displaying the query > text? > > If it is dangerous then surely so is the explanation. cheers andrew
-
Re: WIP: log query in auto-explain
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> — 2009-11-24T00:29:25Z
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > Basically it includes the text of the query being explained in the > explain output. I expected the query text is printed in "STATEMENT" section. Do you mean the query should be merged into "LOG" section? Are there any situation where "STATEMENT" section does not work? Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
-
Re: WIP: log query in auto-explain
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2009-11-24T03:06:06Z
Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > >> Basically it includes the text of the query being explained in the >> explain output. >> > > I expected the query text is printed in "STATEMENT" section. > Do you mean the query should be merged into "LOG" section? > Are there any situation where "STATEMENT" section does not work? > I mean it should be in the Explain output: <explain xmlns="http://www.postgresql.org/2009/explain"> <Query-Text>SELECT '' AS zero, BOOLTBL1.* FROM BOOLTBL1 WHERE booleq(bool 'false', f1);</Query-Text> <Plan> <Node-Type>Seq Scan</Node-Type> <Relation-Name>booltbl1</Relation-Name> <Alias>booltbl1</Alias> <Startup-Cost>0.00</Startup-Cost> <Total-Cost>42.88</Total-Cost> <Plan-Rows>877</Plan-Rows> <Plan-Width>1</Plan-Width> <Filter>booleq(false, f1)</Filter> </Plan> </explain> This is especially important for structured output like XML and/or JSON. A number of users (including me) badly want to be able to extract the explain output from the log files with the query text included. cheers andrew > -
Re: WIP: log query in auto-explain
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> — 2009-11-24T03:13:26Z
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > I mean it should be in the Explain output: > <explain xmlns="http://www.postgresql.org/2009/explain"> > <Query-Text>SELECT '' AS zero, BOOLTBL1.* > A number of users (including me) badly want to be able to extract the > explain output from the log files with the query text included. I see it's useful for non-text output format. +1 for the extension. Also please include the documentation fix because it contains a sample output using STATEMENT section. Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center