Thread

  1. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> — 2003-11-06T08:21:09Z

     
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] 
    > Sent: 05 November 2003 23:11
    > To: Josh Berkus
    > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
    > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
    > 
    > Josh Berkus writes:
    > 
    > > If possible, for the upcoming release we'd like to get the 
    > Contributor List on
    > > developer.postgresql.org updated.   Can everyone please 
    > take a gander at:
    > > http://developer.postgresql.org/bios.php
    > 
    > One thing that really puzzles me is this web page:
    > 
    > http://advocacy.postgresql.org/about/
    
    Personnally I don't see why that whole site isn't part of the main site.
    
    Regards, Dave.
    
    
  2. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> — 2003-11-06T14:25:38Z

    On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:21, Dave Page wrote:
    >  
    > 
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] 
    > > Sent: 05 November 2003 23:11
    > > To: Josh Berkus
    > > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
    > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
    > > 
    > > Josh Berkus writes:
    > > 
    > > > If possible, for the upcoming release we'd like to get the 
    > > Contributor List on
    > > > developer.postgresql.org updated.   Can everyone please 
    > > take a gander at:
    > > > http://developer.postgresql.org/bios.php
    > > 
    > > One thing that really puzzles me is this web page:
    > > 
    > > http://advocacy.postgresql.org/about/
    > 
    > Personnally I don't see why that whole site isn't part of the main site.
    > 
    
    Because when it was originally created the guy doing the main website
    and the guy doing the advocacy website weren't big on nuzzling together.
    
    The advocacy site does have different requirements than the main site,
    namely its bi-lingualness and the different target audience, but perhaps
    with adding bi-lingual capabilities to the main site these two sites
    could be brought together.  
    
    Robert Treat 
    -- 
    Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
    
    
    
  3. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> — 2003-11-06T14:46:41Z

    On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:25:38AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
    
    > The advocacy site does have different requirements than the main site,
    > namely its bi-lingualness and the different target audience, but perhaps
    > with adding bi-lingual capabilities to the main site these two sites
    > could be brought together.  
    
    Certainly; see the www.debian.org for an example.  They have
    multilingual capabilities across the whole site.
    
    -- 
    Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
    "Cómo ponemos nuestros dedos en la arcilla del otro. Eso es la amistad; jugar
    al alfarero y ver qué formas se pueden sacar del otro" (C. Halloway en
    La Feria de las Tinieblas, R. Bradbury)
    
    
  4. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> — 2003-11-06T22:05:22Z

    On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 09:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
    > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:25:38AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
    > 
    > > The advocacy site does have different requirements than the main site,
    > > namely its bi-lingualness and the different target audience, but perhaps
    > > with adding bi-lingual capabilities to the main site these two sites
    > > could be brought together.  
    > 
    > Certainly; see the www.debian.org for an example.  They have
    > multilingual capabilities across the whole site.
    > 
    <rant>
    we don't need links, we need patches
    </rant>
    
    we do have this development in progress, theres just the matter of
    getting time to make it happen.
    
    Robert Treat
    -- 
    Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
    
    
    
  5. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2003-11-06T22:18:13Z

    Robert Treat writes:
    
    > <rant>
    > we don't need links, we need patches
    > </rant>
    
    Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
    
    How does one get involved?
    Where is the code?
    What is the plan?
    Where is the roadmap?
    Where can issues be discussed?
    Who is working on this?
    How can we help?
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
    
    
    
  6. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> — 2003-11-06T22:33:25Z

    Peter,
    
    > Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
    
    This isn't helping.   What Robert was pointing out is that we don't currently 
    have enough people writing HTML and PHP to finish improving the site anytime 
    soon.   Robert doesn't need "managerial direction."
    
    Or did you have ambitions to be a PHB?   ;-p
    
    -- 
    -Josh Berkus
     Aglio Database Solutions
     San Francisco
    
    
    
  7. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2003-11-07T00:47:12Z

    Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
    > Peter,
    >> Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
    
    > This isn't helping.  What Robert was pointing out is that we don't
    > currently have enough people writing HTML and PHP to finish improving
    > the site anytime soon.
    
    Peter appeared to be asking how additional people could get involved.
    Or do you *want* to keep the web group too small to get things done?
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
  8. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> — 2003-11-07T03:42:57Z

    On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
    > Robert Treat writes:
    > > <rant>
    > > we don't need links, we need patches
    > > </rant>
    >
    > Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
    >
    > How does one get involved?
    post proposals to pgsql-www and start coding
    
    > Where is the code?
    http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgweb/projdisplay.php
    
    > What is the plan?
    if you have an itch, scratch it...
    
    > Where is the roadmap?
    right now andreas' is working on multi-lingual capabilities. i have half an 
    implementation of variable site width i'd love to finish off, and we have 
    some pages for things like the release notes that we need to add to the 
    dynamic site building scripts.  
    
    on the advocacy site, there is a file called TODO in the main directory that 
    has some issues in it that need to be addressed in the current system. 
    potentially we will also need to add translated press kits and release notes 
    to the system.
    
    on techdocs there is a todo.php file which is probably completely bogus.  
    theres some indecision on the direction of this site. I would like to convert 
    the whole thing to CVS, including the wiki pages that comprised the guides 
    section.  others are testing using bricolage to make a new site at which time 
    some of the data would be transitioned over.  i happen to think there are 
    several files on this site that should be moved to the main www site, i'd be 
    happy to expand on that if people start doing work on it.  really the most 
    important thing here is that we get some movement on the site in order to 
    ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new web VM.
    
    > Where can issues be discussed?
    pgsql-www@postgresql.org
    
    > Who is working on this?
    myself, dave page, devrim gunduz, andreas grabmller are the primary folks 
    doing the work, though there are certainly others involved. [that guy marc 
    seems to be involved somewhat ;-) ]
    
    > How can we help?
    never send an email saying "you guys should post such and such news item on 
    the web site". instead submit the news item yourself and we can have it 
    approved and on the site in much less time.   :-)
    
    otherwise it works much like any other open source project, if there is 
    something specific you want to work on, post a proposal or ask if anyone else 
    is working on it on the -www list.
    
    let me also say on a personal note that if none of this looks interesting but 
    there is something else that i am working on that you'd like to get involved 
    in, drop me a line.  that last thing i want to do is to continue to 
    consolidate work around me, I'd much rather empower others to become regular 
    contributors. 
    
    Robert Treat
    -- 
    Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
    
    
  9. Re: [pgsql-www] Changes to Contributor List

    Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> — 2003-11-07T12:18:37Z

    Well the current argument aside, I do find it discouraging that there is
    a considerable difference between the four sites, advocacy, gborg, dev,
    and the main site, not only in form but in substance. 
    
    I am listed on the dev site as a major contributor, but not on the
    advocacy site. Where was the list compiled from on the advocacy site?
    
    
    Dave 
    
    On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 19:47, Tom Lane wrote:
    > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
    > > Peter,
    > >> Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
    > 
    > > This isn't helping.  What Robert was pointing out is that we don't
    > > currently have enough people writing HTML and PHP to finish improving
    > > the site anytime soon.
    > 
    > Peter appeared to be asking how additional people could get involved.
    > Or do you *want* to keep the web group too small to get things done?
    > 
    > 			regards, tom lane
    > 
    > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
    > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    >     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
    > 
    > 
    
    
    
  10. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> — 2003-11-07T18:51:03Z

    Robert,
    
    > on techdocs there is a todo.php file which is probably completely bogus.
    > theres some indecision on the direction of this site. I would like to
    > convert the whole thing to CVS, including the wiki pages that comprised the
    > guides section.  others are testing using bricolage to make a new site at
    > which time some of the data would be transitioned over. 
    
    Yeah, that's me & Elein & David F.   We feel pretty strongly that PostgreSQL 
    needs a place where users can contribute to documentation and help other 
    users without learning HTML, SGML, or CVS.   Otherwise, we're throwing away a 
    lot of potential contributions and ignoring a lot of the community that wants 
    to help but find the barrier to entry too high.
    
    I also see Techdocs as a "test site" for maybe moving more parts of 
    postgresql.org to a sophisticated CMS; while CVS is nice for version control, 
    it does nothing to help control style consistency, dynamic linking, or 
    multi-lingualism, which must all still be done 100% manually.
    
    However, we've been real sluggards about getting this up & running.   So if 
    you get the other stuff re-built and we're still lagging, then you'll have 
    come up with a very persuasive argument to do things your way.
    
    >  i happen to think
    > there are several files on this site that should be moved to the main www
    > site, i'd be happy to expand on that if people start doing work on it.
    
    Probably, yes.
     
    > really the most important thing here is that we get some movement on the
    > site in order to ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new
    > web VM.
    
    On techdocs?   What part of that needs to be migrated?
    
    -- 
    Josh Berkus
    Aglio Database Solutions
    San Francisco
    
    
  11. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> — 2003-11-07T19:22:00Z

    Tom,
    
    > Peter appeared to be asking how additional people could get involved.
    > Or do you *want* to keep the web group too small to get things done?
    
    Ooops!   Sorry, Peter, I *completely* mis-read your e-mail.
    
    -- 
    Josh Berkus
    Aglio Database Solutions
    San Francisco
    
    
  12. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> — 2003-11-10T15:31:42Z

    On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:51, Josh Berkus wrote:
    > > really the most important thing here is that we get some movement on the
    > > site in order to ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new
    > > web VM.
    > 
    > On techdocs?   What part of that needs to be migrated?
    > 
    
    Last I check it was the whole thing... techdocs runs on its own VM, the
    other sites all run on a different VM. We need to kill the old VM, but
    until we move techdocs to it's new home, we can't
    
    Robert Treat
    -- 
    Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
    
    
    
  13. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Marc Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org> — 2003-11-10T15:48:07Z

    
    On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
    
    > On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:51, Josh Berkus wrote:
    > > > really the most important thing here is that we get some movement on the
    > > > site in order to ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new
    > > > web VM.
    > >
    > > On techdocs?   What part of that needs to be migrated?
    > >
    >
    > Last I check it was the whole thing... techdocs runs on its own VM, the
    > other sites all run on a different VM. We need to kill the old VM, but
    > until we move techdocs to it's new home, we can't
    
    And there is no pressure/hurry for this to be done ... its not a 'simple
    move', but a redesign based on new technology ... what is there now,
    works, so no pressure
    
    
  14. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> — 2003-11-10T16:24:31Z

    Marc G. Fournier wrote:
    > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
    <snip>
    >>>On techdocs?   What part of that needs to be migrated?
    >>>
    >>
    >>Last I check it was the whole thing... techdocs runs on its own VM, the
    >>other sites all run on a different VM. We need to kill the old VM, but
    >>until we move techdocs to it's new home, we can't
    > 
    > And there is no pressure/hurry for this to be done ... its not a 'simple
    > move', but a redesign based on new technology ... what is there now,
    > works, so no pressure
    
     From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs 
    virtual machine too.  That may or may not be the case these days, I just 
    don't remember.
    
    Regards and best wishes,
    
    Justin Clift
    
    
    > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
    > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    >     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
    
    
    
  15. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> — 2003-11-10T18:12:29Z

    Justin,
    
    >  From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
    > virtual machine too.  That may or may not be the case these days, I just
    > don't remember.
    
    Really?   I thought that they were running from one of Sun's machines.   Will 
    check with Cristian.   
    
    If we're hosting the surveys, I want a "Powered by PostgreSQL" bug on them, 
    dammit.   Those get 21,000 views a week.
    
    -- 
    Josh Berkus
    Aglio Database Solutions
    San Francisco
    
    
  16. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Marc Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org> — 2003-11-10T18:27:52Z

    
    On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
    
    > Justin,
    >
    > >  From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
    > > virtual machine too.  That may or may not be the case these days, I just
    > > don't remember.
    >
    > Really?   I thought that they were running from one of Sun's machines.   Will
    > check with Cristian.
    >
    > If we're hosting the surveys, I want a "Powered by PostgreSQL" bug on them,
    > dammit.   Those get 21,000 views a week.
    
    start of current access_log: 217.1.97.253 - - [08/Nov/2003:08:00:28 -0500]
      end of current access_log: 141.211.97.33 - - [10/Nov/2003:13:28:39 -0500]
    
    jobs# grep http://oosurvey.gratismania.ro/user/index.php access_log | egrep -v "images" | wc -l
        2966
    
    looks like its still well used ...
    
    
    
  17. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Marc Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org> — 2003-11-10T18:59:53Z

    In fact: http://oosurvey.gratismania.ro/stats
    
    On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
    
    >
    >
    > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
    >
    > > Justin,
    > >
    > > >  From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
    > > > virtual machine too.  That may or may not be the case these days, I just
    > > > don't remember.
    > >
    > > Really?   I thought that they were running from one of Sun's machines.   Will
    > > check with Cristian.
    > >
    > > If we're hosting the surveys, I want a "Powered by PostgreSQL" bug on them,
    > > dammit.   Those get 21,000 views a week.
    >
    > start of current access_log: 217.1.97.253 - - [08/Nov/2003:08:00:28 -0500]
    >   end of current access_log: 141.211.97.33 - - [10/Nov/2003:13:28:39 -0500]
    >
    > jobs# grep http://oosurvey.gratismania.ro/user/index.php access_log | egrep -v "images" | wc -l
    >     2966
    >
    > looks like its still well used ...
    >
    >
    
    
  18. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> — 2003-11-10T19:26:12Z

    Guys,
    
    > > > If we're hosting the surveys, I want a "Powered by PostgreSQL" bug on
    > > > them, dammit.   Those get 21,000 views a week.
    
    Taken care of.  We should get a button up soon.
    
    -- 
    Josh Berkus
    Aglio Database Solutions
    San Francisco
    
    
  19. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> — 2003-11-11T13:42:22Z

    Hi guys,
    
    Alvaro, do you know how (or if) the people that do stuff for the Debian 
    website overcame the problem of everyone needing to know HTML?
    
    Regards and best wishes,
    
    Justin Clift
    
    
    Alvaro Herrera wrote:
    > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:25:38AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
    > 
    > 
    >>The advocacy site does have different requirements than the main site,
    >>namely its bi-lingualness and the different target audience, but perhaps
    >>with adding bi-lingual capabilities to the main site these two sites
    >>could be brought together.  
    > 
    > 
    > Certainly; see the www.debian.org for an example.  They have
    > multilingual capabilities across the whole site.
    > 
    
    
    
  20. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> — 2003-11-11T15:28:03Z

    On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:42:22PM +0800, Justin Clift wrote:
    
    > Alvaro, do you know how (or if) the people that do stuff for the Debian 
    > website overcame the problem of everyone needing to know HTML?
    
    Huh, sorry, no idea at all.  I was just visiting the Debian site.
    
    -- 
    Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
    "Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a rumor that
    you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise.
    It's worth the effort. Recommended."  (Gerry Pourwelle)
    
    
  21. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> — 2003-11-11T15:36:42Z

    Alvaro Herrera wrote:
    > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:42:22PM +0800, Justin Clift wrote:
    > 
    >>Alvaro, do you know how (or if) the people that do stuff for the Debian 
    >>website overcame the problem of everyone needing to know HTML?
    > 
    > Huh, sorry, no idea at all.  I was just visiting the Debian site.
    
    Rats.  It might still be worth asking them though, just in case they 
    found a good solution.
    
    Anyone know the Debian webmasters?  From memory, some of the translation 
    volunteers do stuff with/for them.
    
    Regards and best wishes,
    
    Justin Clift
    
    
    
  22. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@ufgnet.ufg.br> — 2003-11-11T16:28:30Z

    On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:36:42 +0800 Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> wrote:
    
    > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
    > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:42:22PM +0800, Justin Clift wrote:
    > > 
    > >>Alvaro, do you know how (or if) the people that do stuff for the Debian 
    > >>website overcame the problem of everyone needing to know HTML?
    > > 
    All the translators do know HTML. And I wanna propose to use the internationalization like Debian Project, eg, using Languages capabilities of Apache Webserver.
    Basically we have:
    index.html.en
    index.html.pt-br
    index.html.es
    index.html.se
    ...
    
    
    > Anyone know the Debian webmasters?  From memory, some of the translation 
    > volunteers do stuff with/for them.
    > 
    I think this is not too hard to translate just the text in the HTML. What do you guys think?
    
    PS> I redesigned the main website and wanna propose it in the end of the afternoon.
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Euler Taveira de Oliveira
    euler (at) ufgnet.ufg.br
    Desenvolvedor Web e Administrador de Sistemas
    UFGNet - Universidade Federal de Goiás
    
    
  23. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> — 2003-11-11T17:51:48Z

    On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:28:30PM -0200, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
    
    > All the translators do know HTML. And I wanna propose to use the
    > internationalization like Debian Project, eg, using Languages
    > capabilities of Apache Webserver.
    
    If the text could be automatically generated from a DocBook source, then
    the translation could be handled by the same mechanism the KDE guys use:
    a Docbook -> PO -> Docbook tool.  Translator don't have to know HTML;
    they just use KBabel or gtranslator, etc.  That's the theory at least ...
    
    I've mentioned this already regarding documentation translations, maybe
    the idea can be useful here.
    
    -- 
    Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
    "Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a rumor that
    you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise.
    It's worth the effort. Recommended."  (Gerry Pourwelle)
    
    
  24. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> — 2003-11-11T18:11:35Z

    Euler, Alvaro,
    
    > All the translators do know HTML. And I wanna propose to use the
    > internationalization like Debian Project, eg, using Languages capabilities
    > of Apache Webserver. Basically we have:
    
    I manage PostgreSQL's team of translators for advocacy/website stuff, and I 
    can tell you that they don't all, or even most, know enough HTML to handle 
    even a simple table.  
    
    > If the text could be automatically generated from a DocBook source, then
    > the translation could be handled by the same mechanism the KDE guys use:
    > a Docbook -> PO -> Docbook tool.  Translator don't have to know HTML;
    > they just use KBabel or gtranslator, etc.  That's the theory at least ...
    
    This is a fine idea if we can come up with a tool which is available on all 
    major platforms: win95, winNT/2k, Mac OS X, Linux and BSD.   Otherwise, a web 
    form will be a *lot* easier to manage.
    
    Personally, even when I'm editing something which someone else has marked up I 
    find editing wiki-markup to be *much* easier.   In HTML, it's far two easy to 
    accidentially paste over a closing tag or a bracket and screw up the whole 
    page.  This will be even more the case if you want to adopt the stricter 
    XHTML.
    
    -- 
    Josh Berkus
    Aglio Database Solutions
    San Francisco
    
    
  25. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com> — 2003-11-11T18:36:23Z

    From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
    Date: Wed Nov 12, 2003  3:34:28 AM Asia/Tokyo
    To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
    Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
    
    
    On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 03:11 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
    
    > accidentially paste over a closing tag or a bracket and screw up the 
    > whole
    > page.  This will be even more the case if you want to adopt the 
    > stricter
    > XHTML.
    
    Practically, only screw up in terms of whether or not the page still 
    validates. Most browsers, with their built-in forgiveness that lets 
    them handle the 95% of invalid markup that's out there, won't break any 
    more with invalid XHTML than they would with the same (invalid) HTML. 
    There are a few browsers that change their behavior slightly depending 
    on the document declaration, but from what I gather, the differences a 
    slight. And at the extreme, I don't know of any browers that attempt to 
    validate the page against the DTD and refuse to display if if they 
    don't.
    
    This isn't an excuse to not write the best markup possible, of course.
    
    
    
  26. Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> — 2003-11-11T19:17:42Z

    On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:11:35AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
    > Euler, Alvaro,
    
    > > If the text could be automatically generated from a DocBook source, then
    > > the translation could be handled by the same mechanism the KDE guys use:
    > > a Docbook -> PO -> Docbook tool.  Translator don't have to know HTML;
    > > they just use KBabel or gtranslator, etc.  That's the theory at least ...
    > 
    > This is a fine idea if we can come up with a tool which is available on all 
    > major platforms: win95, winNT/2k, Mac OS X, Linux and BSD.   Otherwise, a web 
    > form will be a *lot* easier to manage.
    
    Personally, as a seasoned translator ;-), I find a web form practically
    unusable compared to a PO catalog editor.  I think the pgAdmin guys have
    some indication of a program that works on Windows.  I dunno about Mac
    OS X.  Gnome and KDE both have good tools that work on Linux, BSD and
    some others.
    
    -- 
    Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
    "Aprende a avergonzarte más ante ti que ante los demás" (Demócrito)