Andrew McMillan

andrew@catalyst.net.nz

Email: andrew@catalyst.net.nz
Name: Andrew McMillan
Messages: 98
First message: 2000-05-03
Last message: 2007-05-13

Recent messages

DateSubject
2007-05-13T06:34:20Z Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
2007-04-13T08:35:55Z Re: Question about memory allocations
2005-11-08T02:35:20Z Re: Temporary Table
2005-10-06T18:50:01Z Re: index on custom function; explain
2005-07-29T20:19:31Z Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0
2005-07-29T05:50:11Z Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0
2005-06-06T06:48:45Z Re: Postgresql and Software RAID/LVM
2005-06-02T23:19:28Z Re: Adaptec/LSI/?? RAID (what about JBOD?)
2005-06-02T09:15:13Z Re: Adaptec/LSI/?? RAID
2005-05-29T21:46:43Z Re: OID vs overall system performances on high load
2005-05-28T05:08:10Z Re: OID vs overall system performances on high load
2004-12-13T09:56:29Z Re: Using LIMIT changes index used by planner
2004-12-02T17:58:15Z Re: pg_restore taking 4 hours!
2004-12-01T08:23:30Z Re: Using "LIMIT" is much faster even though, searching
2004-11-26T01:37:12Z Re: Postgres vs. DSpam
2004-11-13T09:56:52Z Re: A modest proposal: get rid of GUC's USERLIMIT
2004-11-11T23:20:24Z Re: A modest proposal: get rid of GUC's USERLIMIT
2004-11-10T10:47:24Z Re: A modest proposal: get rid of GUC's USERLIMIT
2004-11-10T10:30:32Z Re: ALTER USER SET log_* not allowed...
2004-11-06T09:36:25Z Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
2004-11-05T08:48:59Z Re: Checking = with timestamp field is slow
2004-10-26T20:50:50Z Re: can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs
2004-10-20T07:50:44Z Re: Insert performance, what should I expect?
2004-07-05T19:22:05Z Re: Seq scan vs. Index scan with different query
2004-07-05T11:44:13Z Re: Seq scan vs. Index scan with different query
2004-07-05T09:18:58Z Re: LinuxTag wrapup
2004-06-21T10:11:49Z Re: Slow vacuum performance
2004-06-18T08:15:44Z Re: Slow vacuum performance
2004-05-19T11:21:22Z Re: DB Design
2004-05-12T08:58:13Z Re: Quad processor options
2004-04-25T07:13:35Z Re: Wierd context-switching issue on Xeon patch for 7.4.1
2004-04-08T08:54:39Z Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
2004-04-07T11:29:42Z Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
2004-01-15T02:57:08Z Re: 100 simultaneous connections, critical limit?
2003-07-25T10:45:38Z Re: Tuning PostgreSQL
2003-03-21T20:06:11Z Re: Make PGSQL faster
2003-02-06T19:42:41Z Re: PG do not accept quoted names for tables/columns
2003-02-04T08:40:50Z Re: Bug #891: CAP letters
2002-10-24T00:02:15Z Re: [BUGS] Optimization disaster
2002-06-06T10:52:06Z Re: drop tempoary table VERY slow
2002-06-05T11:57:47Z Re: drop tempoary table VERY slow
2002-06-02T10:52:17Z Re: drop tempoary table VERY slow
2002-05-30T11:12:25Z Re: Documentation regarding %ROWTYPE in PL/PgSQL
2002-05-28T09:06:46Z Re: Documentation regarding %ROWTYPE in PL/PgSQL
2002-05-27T09:43:47Z Documentation regarding %ROWTYPE in PL/PgSQL
2002-03-01T23:56:22Z Re: Bug #605: timestamp(timestamp('a timestamp)) no longer works
2002-03-01T11:20:36Z Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your
2002-02-25T00:09:07Z Re: Duration of beta period
2002-02-09T01:10:23Z Re: Database abstration layers
2002-02-06T18:41:38Z Re: Management tool support and scalibility