Messages in pgsql-bugs

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages same messages as JSON; filter by `list`, `from`/`to`. API reference →
Date ▲ SubjectFrom
1999-12-27T15:52:43Z Re: [BUGS] Always one row with group by / agregate Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
1999-12-27T16:00:38Z Re: [BUGS] Equal test on strings doesn't ignore trailing spaces if the function 'lower' is applied Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
1999-12-28T20:09:15Z INET operators and NOT Tomas Cerha <t.cerha@sh.cvut.cz>
1999-12-28T20:14:46Z INET operators and NOT Tomas Cerha <t.cerha@sh.cvut.cz>
1999-12-28T20:19:51Z rs6000-aix4.2.1.0 - build failure[B Samuel A Horwitz <horwitz@argoscomp.com>
1999-12-28T20:30:48Z rs6000-aix4.2.1.0 - build failure Samuel A Horwitz <horwitz@argoscomp.com>
1999-12-28T23:35:44Z Re: [BUGS] INET operators and NOT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
1999-12-29T08:03:51Z unsubscribe Erix MOLINIE <erix@axis.fr>
1999-12-29T18:28:44Z view problem Luca ghedini <luca.ghedini@mail.ing.unibo.it>
2000-01-01T13:56:35Z bugs greathunterbob@webtv.net (Robert Mcbride)
2000-01-01T23:39:28Z what can i do about the 554 hop count/ greathunterbob@webtv.net (Robert Mcbride)
2000-01-02T14:15:47Z Date calc bug Olivier PRENANT <ohp@pyrenet.fr>
2000-01-02T18:02:00Z Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2000-01-03T13:42:01Z A bug wrobell <wrobell@posexperts.com.pl>
2000-01-04T08:11:32Z Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug Has attachments Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
2000-01-04T12:15:59Z vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) Dirk Lutzebaeck <lutzeb@aeccom.com>
2000-01-04T12:27:50Z Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) Dirk Lutzebaeck <lutzeb@aeccom.com>
2000-01-04T15:27:29Z inheritance of functions in postgres Andrzej Mazurkiewicz <andrzej.mazurkiewicz@polkomtel.com.pl>
2000-01-04T16:12:38Z Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2000-01-04T17:30:54Z Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2000-01-04T18:07:38Z Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug Has attachments Olivier PRENANT <ohp@pyrenet.fr>
2000-01-04T19:45:08Z Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k)] Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
2000-01-04T20:01:32Z Re: [BUGS] problem creating index in 6,5,3 Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@range.infoplease.com>
2000-01-04T22:00:18Z Re: [BUGS] problem creating index in 6,5,3 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2000-01-05T07:47:28Z Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) Dirk Lutzebaeck <lutzeb@aeccom.com>