Messages in pgsql-bugs

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages same messages as JSON; filter by `list`, `from`/`to`. API reference →
Date ▼ SubjectFrom
2025-10-06T12:04:36Z Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases Has attachments Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
2025-10-06T11:34:56Z Re: [BUGS] BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
2025-10-06T10:44:28Z Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
2025-10-06T10:40:01Z Re: Potential "AIO / io workers" inter-worker locking issue in PG18? Marco Boeringa <marco@boeringa.demon.nl>
2025-10-06T10:38:55Z Re: [BUGS] BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
2025-10-06T09:55:54Z Re: Potential "AIO / io workers" inter-worker locking issue in PG18? Marco Boeringa <marco@boeringa.demon.nl>
2025-10-06T06:49:41Z Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
2025-10-06T06:22:21Z Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
2025-10-06T03:59:09Z Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
2025-10-06T03:42:06Z Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
2025-10-06T03:37:21Z Re: TRAP: failed Assert("outerPlan != NULL") in postgres_fdw.c Has attachments Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2025-10-05T20:22:32Z Re: Potential "AIO / io workers" inter-worker locking issue in PG18? Marco Boeringa <marco@boeringa.demon.nl>
2025-10-05T19:57:48Z Re: Potential "AIO / io workers" inter-worker locking issue in PG18? Marco Boeringa <marco@boeringa.demon.nl>
2025-10-05T18:09:19Z Re: [BUGS] BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2025-10-05T17:15:25Z Re: TRAP: failed Assert("outerPlan != NULL") in postgres_fdw.c Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
2025-10-05T15:48:33Z Re: BUG #19073: there are meaningless code in _SPI_execute_plan() when canSetTag is true Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2025-10-05T14:47:59Z Re: BUG #19073: there are meaningless code in _SPI_execute_plan() when canSetTag is true "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
2025-10-05T10:51:19Z Re: Potential "AIO / io workers" inter-worker locking issue in PG18? Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
2025-10-05T10:06:27Z Re: Potential "AIO / io workers" inter-worker locking issue in PG18? Markus KARG <markus@headcrashing.eu>
2025-10-05T10:05:59Z 回复:BUG #19073: there are meaningless code in _SPI_execute_plan() when canSetTag is true Has attachments webbohan <webbohan@qq.com>
2025-10-05T08:55:01Z Potential "AIO / io workers" inter-worker locking issue in PG18? Marco Boeringa <marco@boeringa.demon.nl>
2025-10-05T06:41:06Z Re: [BUGS] BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
2025-10-05T06:38:14Z Re: [BUGS] BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
2025-10-05T05:20:21Z BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
2025-10-05T02:29:34Z BUG #19073: there are meaningless code in _SPI_execute_plan() when canSetTag is true PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>