Horton

Re: daitch_mokotoff module

Dag Lem <dag@nimrod.no>

View thread
From: Dag Lem <dag@nimrod.no>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-12-05T13:24:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Avoid using non-ASCII commentary in daitch_mokotoff.c.

  2. Remove some non-ASCII symbols from a comment.

  3. Remove useless dependencies in daitch_mokotoff_header.pl.

  4. Pacify perlcritic.

  5. Add support for Daitch-Mokotoff Soundex in contrib/fuzzystrmatch.

  6. Enable routine running of citext's UTF8-specific test cases.

Hi Ian,

Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Dag
>
> 2022年2月3日(木) 23:27 Dag Lem <dag@nimrod.no>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just some minor adjustments to the patch:
>>
>> * Removed call to locale-dependent toupper()
>> * Cleaned up input normalization
>
> This patch was marked as "Waiting on Author" in the CommitFest entry [1]
> but I see you provided an updated version which hasn't received any feedback,
> so I've move this to the next CommitFest [2] and set it to "Needs Review".
>
> [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/40/3451/
> [2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/3451/
>
>> I have been asked to sign up to review a commitfest patch or patches -
>> unfortunately I've been ill with COVID-19 and it's not until now that
>> I feel well enough to have a look.
>>
>> Julien: I'll have a look at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/36/3468/
>> as you suggested (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/36/3379/ seems to
>> have been reviewed now).
>>
>> If there are other suggestions for a patch or patches to review for
>> someone new to PostgreSQL internals, I'd be grateful for that.
>
> I see you provided some feedback on https://commitfest.postgresql.org/36/3468/,
> though the patch seems to have not been accepted (but not conclusively rejected
> either). If you still have the chance to review another patch (or more) it would
> be much appreciated, as there's quite a few piling up. Things like documentation
> or small improvements to client applications are always a good place to start.
> Reviews can be provided at any time, there's no need to wait for the next
> CommitFest.
>

OK, I'll try to find another patch to review.

Regards

Dag Lem