Re: RPM building (was regression on RedHat)
Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com>
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød )
To: Justin Clift <aa2@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: lockhart@fourpalms.org, Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-03-22T00:43:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Justin Clift <aa2@bigpond.net.au> writes: > It's not "Mandrake" that will be broken. Mandrake is also often used by > new Linux users who wouldn't have the slightest idea about setting GCC > options. It'll be THEM that have broken installations if we take this > approach (as an aside, that means that WE will be probably also be > answering more questions about PostgreSQL being broken on Mandrake > systems). > > Isn't it better that PostgreSQL works with what it's got on a system AND > ALSO that someone notifies the Mandrake people regarding the problem? Most people will use what the vendor ship - a vendor (like us) look into the benefits (stability, performance, compatiblity) of different packages, and make a selection. If they've done a choice of which options are used in their distribution, they are obviously fine with the consequences. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.