Re: Explicit config patch 7.2B4
Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com>
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød )
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-12-17T16:26:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > That's been Mark's primary argument all along, and what it ignores is > that the standard behavior for daemons is designed around the assumption > that a system is running only one copy of any given daemon. That's a > fine assumption for most daemons but an unacceptable one for Postgres. I don't think there would be that much problems with it, but you can always have defaults in one location and allow them to be overridable. > > However, it wouldn't surprize me in the least for a distributor > > such as Red Hat to apply this patch. > > Oh, I doubt it... > > regards, tom lane > Red Hat Database project Don't. I'd do it in a heartbeat - I'd love to have /etc/postgresql/ with defaults. Configuration files should not be located in /var. regards, Trond Eivind Glomsrød developer, Red Hat Linux developer -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.