Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com>
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød )
To: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-11-02T19:31:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > Now, J Random slides in the new OS CD on a backup of his main server, > and upgrades. RedHat 7.2's installer is very smart -- if no packages > are left that use glibc 2.0, it doesn't install the compat-libs > necessary for glibc 2.0 apps to run. Actually, glibc is a bad example of things to break - it has versioned symbols, so postgresql is pretty likely to continue working (barring doing extremely low-level stuff, like doing weird things to the loader or depend on buggy behaviour (like Oracle did)). Postgresql doesn't use C++ either (which is a horrible mess wrt. binary compatibility - there is no such thing, FTTB). However, if it depended on kernel specific behaviour (like things in /proc, which may or may not have changed its output format) it could break. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.