Re: How is this possible? (more on deadlocks)
Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-08-27T19:43:25Z
Lists: pgsql-general
>>>>> "CM" == Carlos Moreno <moreno@mochima.com> writes: CM> Ok, now I'm really intrigued by what looks to me CM> (possibly from a naive point of view) like a bug, CM> or rather, a limitation on the implementation. [[ ... ]] CM> I don't know about the internals of how transactions CM> and locks and FK constraints are handled, but I'm CM> analyzing it and describing what seems to be CM> happening internally, based on the behaviour I CM> observe. FWIW I get bit by this quite a bit. Unfortunately all the deadlock avoidance theory doesn't help you since you're not explicitly getting the locks, and as you see, ordering the insert/update operations such as to avoid conflicting locks is hard to do. If I could designate the transaction I prefer to be killed, it would save me a lot: often my short easy to repeat transaction wins out over some large multi-thousand row select/insertion operation. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/