Re: what is good solution for support NULL inside string_to_array function?

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2010-05-04T11:53:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/5/4 Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>:
>
>> quietly removing NULL is maybe good for compatibility but is wrong for
>> functionality.
>
> I agree.  I wasn't aware of this little misfeature.
>
> Default display for NULL should be a zero-length string.
>

I disagree - NULL is NULL, not empty string (Oracle is different)

if array_to_string is equivalent to

x[1] || sep || x[2] || sep || x[3] || sep ....

then correct result is NULL

and then string_to_array and array_to_string are correct, because
string_to_array cannot contain any NULL symbol.

Regards
Pavel Stehule



> --
>                                  -- Josh Berkus
>                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
>                                     http://www.pgexperts.com
>