Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

To: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>

Cc: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2025-04-07T18:11:28Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-04-07 19:59:59 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> This reminds me whether it's fine to have "os_page_num" as int. Should
> we make it bigint, perhaps?

Yes, that's better. Seems very unlikely anybody will encounter this in the
next few years, but it's basically free to use the larger range here.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

doc: Correct pg_shmem_allocations_numa.size data type
- b8a6078ca8f4 18.0 landed
Add pg_buffercache_numa view with NUMA node info
- ba2a3c2302f1 18.0 landed
Add support for basic NUMA awareness
- 65c298f61fc7 18.0 landed
Introduce pg_shmem_allocations_numa view
- 8cc139bec34a 18.0 landed