Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD
Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Kevin Lo <jwlo@ms11.hinet.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-03-08T02:05:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Tom Lane wrote: > > > I will pursue fixing things that way in the 6.5 sources. In the > > meantime, do we want to check Kevin's fixes into REL6_4, or is adding > > int8 support for more machines too low-priority to justify taking any > > chance of breaking 6.4.3? > > Note that I commited int8 fixes to the v6.4.3 tree, and they are in the > current beta3 tar file...did this mid-last week... Did you also change the #ifdef line to include __NetBSD__ for the %qd format? At least NetBSD/i386 uses that. Alpha might not, I'm not fully certain, but I think it will work with %qd. --Michael