Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD

Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>

From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Kevin Lo <jwlo@ms11.hinet.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-03-08T02:05:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:

> On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > I will pursue fixing things that way in the 6.5 sources.  In the
> > meantime, do we want to check Kevin's fixes into REL6_4, or is adding
> > int8 support for more machines too low-priority to justify taking any
> > chance of breaking 6.4.3?
> 
> Note that I commited int8 fixes to the v6.4.3 tree, and they are in the
> current beta3 tar file...did this mid-last week...

Did you also change the #ifdef line to include __NetBSD__ for the %qd
format?  At least NetBSD/i386 uses that.  Alpha might not, I'm not
fully certain, but I think it will work with %qd.

--Michael