Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather than ROLERECURSE_PRIVS?
cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com>
From: cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-19T03:42:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, According to the comment in check_role_grantor(): /* * Otherwise, the grantor must either have ADMIN OPTION on the role or * inherit the privileges of a role which does. In the former case, * record the grantor as the current user; in the latter, pick one of * the roles that is "most directly" inherited by the current role * (i.e. fewest "hops"). * * (We shouldn't fail to find a best grantor, because we've already * established that the current user has permission to perform the * operation.) */ grantorId = select_best_admin(currentUserId, roleid); if (!OidIsValid(grantorId)) elog(ERROR, "no possible grantors"); But the "no possible grantors" error can happen in my test case. The main reason is that is_admin_of_role() and select_best_admin() use different role recurse methods. I think they should keep consistent, maybe both use ROLERECURSE_PRIVS? Thoughts? -- Regards, ChangAo Chen