Re: index prefetching
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
aio: io_uring: Trigger async processing for large IOs
- a9ee66881744 19 (unreleased) landed
-
read stream: Split decision about look ahead for AIO and combining
- 8ca147d582a5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
read_stream: Only increase read-ahead distance when waiting for IO
- f63ca3379025 19 (unreleased) landed
-
read_stream: Prevent distance from decaying too quickly
- 6e36930f9aaf 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Reduce ExecSeqScan* code size using pg_assume()
- b227b0bb4e03 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Fix rare bug in read_stream.c's split IO handling.
- b421223172a2 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Fix multiranges to behave more like dependent types.
- 3e8235ba4f9c 17.0 cited
-
Add EXPLAIN (MEMORY) to report planner memory consumption
- 5de890e3610d 17.0 cited
-
Optimize nbtree backward scan boundary cases.
- c9c0589fda0e 17.0 cited
-
Increment xactCompletionCount during subtransaction abort.
- 90c885cdab8b 14.0 cited
-
Add nbtree Valgrind buffer lock checks.
- 4a70f829d86c 14.0 cited
-
Add nbtree high key "continuescan" optimization.
- 29b64d1de7c7 12.0 cited
-
Reduce pinning and buffer content locking for btree scans.
- 2ed5b87f96d4 9.5.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
Hi, On 2025-08-28 19:57:17 -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 7:52 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote: > > Use this branch: > > > > https://github.com/tvondra/postgres/commits/index-prefetch-master/ > > > > and then Thomas' patch that increases the prefetch distance: > > > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGL2PhFyDoqrHefqasOnaXhSg48t1phs3VM8BAdrZqKZkw%40mail.gmail.com > > > > (IIRC there's a trivial conflict in read_stream_reset.). > > I found it quite hard to apply Thomas' patch. There's actually 3 > patches, with 2 earlier patches needed for earlier in the thread. And, > there were significant merge conflicts to work around. Same. Tomas, could you share what you applied? > I'm not sure that Thomas'/your patch to ameliorate the problem on the > read stream side is essential here. Perhaps Andres can just take a > look at the test case + feature branch, without the extra patches. > That way he'll be able to see whatever the immediate problem is, which > might be all we need. It seems caused to a significant degree by waiting at low queue depths. If I comment out the stream->distance-- in read_stream_start_pending_read() the regression is reduced greatly. As far as I can tell, after that the process is CPU bound, i.e. IO waits don't play a role. I see a variety for increased CPU usage: 1) The private ref count infrastructure in bufmgr.c gets a bit slower once more buffers are pinned 2) signalling overhead to the worker - I think we are resetting the latch too eagerly, leading to unnecessarily many signals being sent to the IO worker. 3) same issue with the resowner tracking But there's some additional difference in performance I don't yet understand... Greetings, Andres Freund