Re: analyzer/planner and clustered rows

Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-04-30T07:33:13Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:09:09 -0400, Joseph Shraibman
<jks@selectacast.net> wrote:
>How does the analyzer/planner deal with rows clustered together?

There's a correlation value per column.  Just try

	SELECT attname, correlation
	  FROM pg_stats
	 WHERE tablename = '...';

if you are interested.  It indicates how well the hypothetical order of
tuples if sorted by that column corresponds to the physical order.  +1.0
is perfect correlation, 0.0 is totally chaotic, -1.0 means reverse
order.  The optimizer is more willing to choose an index scan if
correlation for the first index column is near +/-1.

>  What if the data in the table happens to be close 
>together because it was inserted together originally?

Having equal values close to each other is not enough, the values should
be increasing, too.  Compare

	5 5 5 4 4 4 7 7 7 2 2 2 6 6 6 3 3 3 8 8 8   low correlation
and
	2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8   correlation = 1.0