Re: memcached and PostgreSQL
Troels Arvin <troels@arvin.dk>
From: Troels Arvin <troels@arvin.dk>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-11-17T07:48:33Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:47:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > So memcached becomes a very good place to stick data that's read often but not > updated often, or alternately data that changes often but is disposable. An > example of the former is a user+ACL list; and example of the latter is web > session information ... or simple materialized views. Has anyone tried at least two of 1. memcached 2. Tugela Cache (pretty much the same as memcached, I think) 3. Sharedance In that case: Do you have any comparative remarks? Links: 1: http://www.danga.com/memcached/ 2: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tugela_Cache http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wikipedia/tugelacache/ 3: http://sharedance.pureftpd.org/ -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark