Re: Caching Websites

Adam Kessel <adam@bostoncoop.net> writes:

> Based on the documetation, I don't immediately see any disadvantage to
> using these large objects--does anyone else see why I might not want to
> store archived websites in large objects?  

It's going to be (probably) a little slower than the filesystem
solution, and backups are a little more involved (you can't use
pg_dumpall) but everything works--I have been using LOs with success
for a couple years now.

-Doug