Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-03T14:54:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I think that new versions of patch can handle unified diffs without a > problem, but older versions choke on them. My Mac has 2.5.8 and > handles unidiffs no problem. Even containing git headers? Here's what I'm talking about here: src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c | 653 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h | 13 + src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 575 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c b/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c index 8feb601..6094146 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c @@ -82,6 +82,463 @@ static ObjectAddress get_object_address_opcf(ObjectType objtype, List *objname, List *objargs, bool missing_ok); static bool object_exists(ObjectAddress address); Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support