Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-11T20:52:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Anything that got kicked out to pgfoundry would presumably start acting > that way. Anything that's part of core git is going to stay on the same > release cycle as the core, thank you very much. Release engineering is > a big enough headache around here already. Yeah, I should have inquired before to propose. I see two solutions here, one is to just do as you say, the other one would be to have a separate git repository for extensions. You can ignore this if only the default option (your proposal) is sensible… Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support